Unhinged Obsession
2026-07-30 21:00:00 • 50:06
Hello and welcome to the slight political gap fest.
July 30th, 2026, the unhinged obsession edition.
I'm David Plots of CityCast and my new home in Washington DC if I sound different.
The air here getting used to my voice and also I think there's unpacking going on behind me.
So if you're clicking and clacking that might be unpacking.
Oh, I made a run from the New York Times magazine and you're at the law school.
The moments of wonder and joy on the gap.
It's just a version of the gap.
That was Emily Baslan.
Hello, Emily.
Hello.
And of course from his own empire, his empire of words, John Dickerson.
Hello, John.
Hello, David.
May I ask you a question about what's over your left shoulder?
Is that a railing of some sort?
It does.
It does look great.
I'm working in a niche right now.
Oh, yeah.
I think really.
I'm probably going to have to leave this niche and go to an office because the sound is
a little echoey and because I'm just hearing too much else that's going on in the house.
So.
Anyway, this week on the gap fest.
This week on the gap fest is all thematic actually, which is like, I feel like it's, we're
in a Buddhist state or something.
I don't know much about Buddhism, but nothing ever ends anymore.
The notable quality of American political life is that everything is like, is in a constant
state of reed litigation and nothing ever actually gets resolved.
And so all of our topics this week have that quality.
So we're going to talk about the the Iran war that has taken weird new turns.
We're going to talk about the, the never ending demonization of Tony Fauci.
And then the latest fantastical efforts to stop medication abortions.
Plus, of course, we'll have cocktail chatter.
Is your kids birthday coming up?
Don't stress the prep.
The party shot that Michael is your one stop shop for everything from Bluey to rodeo.
Transform your space into a birthday wonderland with dream worthy table skates and decor starting
at $0.99.
Plus, get free helium inflation on select balloon styles.
Whether you're crafting a one of a kind bash or grabbing the essentials, Michael's has
everything to make their big day legendary.
Shop now and order ahead for delivery or in store pickup.
Everything to celebrate anything.
This episode is presented by the planned parenthood Federation of America.
We're watching the devastating consequences of policy decisions play out in real time.
The Trump administration's backers in Congress are trying to permanently defund planned
parenthood.
An effort to shut down health centers and block patient care like wellness exams, cancer
screenings, and more across the country, especially for those with low incomes.
If you want to do something concrete to help, visit planned parenthood.org slash defend.
Your gift builds a future where everyone can get the care they need and deserve.
The Schrodinger's War continued this week.
US attacks on Iran, subsided maybe, but then the US and Saudi Arabia opened a new front
by attacking Iranian allies in Iraq.
There seems to have been an attack in Egypt overnight, maybe from Iran.
We now have a fully regional war.
There's fighting in Iran and Lebanon off the coast of Yemen, Iraq, Jordan, UAE, Qatar, Egypt,
Kuwait.
And President Trump appears utterly perplexed about what to do to resolve it.
John, why?
Well, let me start with a great reporting that I think the Emily's colleagues at the times
did that the US is running alarmingly short of patriot missile interceptors.
What does it, why would that matter?
Why is that an important question?
It's important on so many levels.
Let's take it at face value for a moment because the question is, why is this information
out?
I mean, this is really bad information to have in the public record.
I mean, obviously the Iranians can read the newspapers.
And if they know that the US is running out of these patriot interceptors that protect
not only US bases, but allies in the region, and that are also important for, I mean,
Ukraine needs the same patriot interceptors if you're fighting an invasion from the Chinese,
you need them too.
So this is a catastrophic problem outside of this particular war.
This really comes home from the Haberman Swan book.
It's totally possible that this is actually the case and the only way to get the president
or the system, the chaotic decision-making system in the White House to work is to leak
this kind of thing to kind of put pressures on the president and to get him to think in
a way that the normal process, because there is no normal process it doesn't do.
We've known for months that there are dwindling stockpiles as one of the concerns from military
planners.
And also, it's a question of the moment because the president who has made these threats,
hundreds of them it feels like, threats of increased escalation to get the Iranians
to cry uncle, was considering extending that 13-day pounding and making it even more
severe.
And so the point was basically, you do more of this, you'll get more retaliation, you'll
burn through more of these patriot missile interceptors, and that'll put you in an even
worse strategic position.
I think that for me, what was most important about that reporting in the moment we're
at here is it goes back to the point where we're going to be able to do this.
Back to the question, David Sanger asked, like a month ago, when he was called a traitor,
which was, why if bombing so far hasn't achieved your result, will more bombing achieve
more of your result?
Not, it was just a simple question, like, how do you see that working out?
And the question was so befuddling to the president that he called him a traitor.
And I think the reason that's important is A, we're living through that now.
And B, it goes back to what is arguably one of the original flaws of this engagement,
which is they didn't think through what might happen.
Pete Higgseth was talking, you know, there've been these flyovers over citizens where
there were planes and helicopters are going alarmingly close, doing sort of daring flyovers
and they're like flying over Pensacola Beach and pilots shouldn't be doing this in the
Navy.
They shouldn't be making these, these runs over human beings out, celebrating on the beach.
And Pete Higgseth, but sheared them on because it's like, this is so fun and daring in
a set like this will continue until morale improves.
And there's this same quality of this war, which is like this war will continue.
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
The bombing will continue until morale.
It is like they don't, this inability to break out of a cycle of relentless lack of change
is so hard to comprehend.
They don't, they don't have other tools besides bomb.
This war seems totally feckless and we don't know what the purpose is and pounding them
into submission isn't working so you just keep pounding them.
And then to go back to your point, John, the leak of this information about how we're running
out of Patriot Interceptors is to try to be a countermeasure to say, wait, there's a cost
here.
Like we can't just continue wasting our weaponry and money forever because then we won't
be prepared for other kinds of conflicts that we should be armed against and ready for.
And so it sort of, I mean, it seems as if from the reporting there is very little support
for this strategy from even within the administration, right, that lots of people inside the rooms
are concluding that there's no real strategy here and that it would be better to find an
off ramp.
And so the way they're trying to push Trump onto the off ramp or at least into not continuing
with the increase of the bombings is to say, wait a second, this can't go on forever.
We're, we have this problem here.
And the big problem with the off ramp, which we've talked about for weeks is the off ramp
does not take the United States to the destination.
The president said was the key one.
In other words, what's been going on?
Yeah, we are at a position where now that there've been two changes basically in Iran's
favor.
One has been the ability to use the straight of hormones to basically control the world economy.
And the second is this widening more that David's talking about.
So now the US has to stop the attacks on its allies.
And that's one thing it has to figure out through diplomacy.
And the second thing it has to figure out through diplomacy is the straight of hormones.
You're not going to get to no more nuclear program.
Like that's going.
So now you've taken the off ramp.
Let's say you can control those first two things.
You've got an off ramp.
It means the ultimate reason for which the war was started was a failure.
So that's all we're talking about is status quo anti.
That's right.
Not even says code, not even as good as that's going to be because Iran will have some control
over the straight and will probably extract some tax or fee off of it.
We've lived through different wars, right?
We're old enough.
Like we've lived through several conflicts.
Is this the dumbest one?
Like I try and to remember what it felt like when we were invading Iraq, which I remember
opposing and being extremely concerned about.
I don't know.
Is this like a river?
This is dumber than Iraq.
This is dumber.
Why is it dumber?
It feels dumber to me too.
Well with Iraq, they literally did get rid of the truly awful regime.
They did manage to get rid of a truly awful regime.
Right.
An enormous cost.
Right.
Not that like we would go back and do it again, but there was a, I mean, I don't want it.
It's funny to use the word submission accomplice because I got George W. Bush into so much trouble,
but they did topple Saddam Hussein.
Yeah.
In this case, the regime, it seems to be pretty clear that the regime that is that is now
in power is even more, and this has been some of the analysis coming out of this quote
on quote, surprise attack on Jordan is that the IRGC is now even more in control of things
in Iran than ever so that the early dreams and promotion of the president to have a citizen
led overthrow of the Iranian regime seems a total fantasy.
It was a fantasy in the moment, but now what it's created is a governing structure that's
even more radical than what was there before.
And yeah, we don't need to compare the two, but this is certainly competing for the
dumbest war of our lifetime.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Did you guys read this amazing story in the Atlantic?
Now I can't remember who wrote it about one of the very surprising aspects of this war
is that actually oil prices have not gone up as much as people expected.
Yeah.
Talk about that.
I'm confused by that.
So oil prices have gone up, but they have ended up going up significantly less than
most experts anticipated.
And there's one clear reason which is that China has massively cut the amount of oil
it's importing.
So it is cut with the oil it's importing from that part of the world in half.
Like what's interesting is that experts don't know how it happened because there is no
decline in use of oil in China.
Do they have strategic reserves that they released?
Well, a couple of things.
So number one, no decline in use.
Number two, there's no indication of increased Russian imports into China or exports into
China.
China sneaks around sanctions and gets Russian oil, but there's no evidence of a significant
increase of that.
There's no evidence in the strategic reserves that people know about of any decline in the
strategic reserves.
And so everyone's magic sort of it's magic.
And so there's some sense that maybe there's a mysterious other strategic reserve they
keep.
But the indication is like that China has now proved a couple of things.
One that it's kind of independent of the global oil economy, which means that if there's
a war against Taiwan, the loss of oil imports may not hurt them that much.
Number two, they may have been a strategic decision.
They didn't want to damage the rest of the global economy on which they depend for so
much of their export income.
They don't want to damage Europe and prevent Europe from having the ability to import their
Chinese goods.
And so they didn't want to raise energy prices even more in Europe.
And so they did something strategic that way.
But it's so fascinating that there's this really cool article in the Atlantic, which is
saying like a huge thing has happened in the global economy and no one understands why.
But it's been really influential.
Can I throw out some random, this isn't that's because that's incredibly cool, but I've
nothing to add to it.
One is that when we were talking about the excessive reliance on bombs and blowing things up,
there was reporting from CNN in the Washington Post this week about the 67 attacks on what
the government calls drug boats and the 221 deaths.
And internal government reports that show that those attacks have done nothing to slow
the cocaine trade.
So you have another instance in which we're going to negotiate with bombs.
We're going to blow up stuff and kill lots of people and the end goal was not achieved.
So just like as you're linking like things with like things.
And then you look at the president's polling just back to the idea of an exit ramp.
60% of the country thinks is against what's going on.
And an even greater number of people think of the war was not worth it.
So if the off ramp is taken, it will affirm those people's views that this was a wasted
adventure.
It affirms basically a very bad piece of public opinion polling right at the time we have
an election happening.
So do we just keep lurching forward?
I don't really see how this ends.
I see how it kind of goes like hot cold on off.
Um, worse, not so terrible for a minute, but it just feels like there's, it's really
hard to see how Trump is going to find the exit that he's, that isn't going to lose so
much face that he's going to be able to live with that.
Right.
But then the downside also is he every other day's like where it's going to get worse.
And I know it's not going to get, it's just like this constant.
Oh, totally.
The hero credibility of his of his flasidity.
Good word, flasidity.
Maybe we should end on that.
Yes.
This episode is sponsored by ground news.
I've been fascinated by the reflecting cool story in recent days, just fascinated
my Washingtonian and this fight over the reflecting pool and President Trump's renovation
of it and it attempted renovation has just struck a chord with people in Washington
and around the country.
And there's been a huge amount of news coverage of it.
Ground news is one of the most helpful tools you can find to cut through the noise and
get down to the facts of important stories.
Instead of getting lost in the hype and the headlines, it helps you understand what's
happening.
Ground news.
In a way like the GAB fest, tries to get to the truth and tries to avoid echo chambers.
And it does that by showing you where the news that you're reading comes from, what
its biases are and how you can take into account those biases as you consume news about
topics you care about from sources you trust.
So if you like this podcast, I suspect you'll like ground news.
Go to ground news.com slash GAB to get 40% off the unlimited access, vantage subscription.
That's ground news.com slash GAB, whether you subscribe yourself or send it as a gift.
Ground news.com slash GAB use my link so they know the GAB fest sent you this episode
sponsored by bombas summer is here.
It is actually now here.
It is finally actually here.
And that means outdoors everything.
Beach days backyard barbecues taking the dog for a longer walk.
Bombas makes your comfy summer staple so you can make the most out of all your summer
plans.
They've got great sports socks, which I really care about because I work out a lot.
And especially like their gym socks, which are so cushioned and right where I want them
to be, they're airy, they're sweat wicking.
Bombas socks always feel very light.
And your feet feels good at the end of a workout as they did at the start.
Plus for every bombas item you purchase, an essential clothing item is donated to someone
facing housing insecurity.
One purchased equals one donated over 200 million donations and counting.
Head over to bombas.com slash political and use code political for 20% off your first
purchase.
That's B-O-M-B-A-S dot com slash political code political.
A check out.
When it comes to managing money, forget the hype and look at results.
Bill has a trillion dollars of secure payments powering our bill pay tools.
Instead of just moving money, Bill is powering the financial operations of nearly half a
million customers.
So stop the guesswork and start scaling with the proven choice.
Ready to talk with an expert?
Visit bill.com slash proven to get started and grab a $150 gift card as a thank you.
Terms and conditions apply.
See you off for page for details.
In some version of my own hell, I would be continually called to testify before Congress
and have to listen to Randolph Paul hector me about something I did or did not say seven
years earlier.
Tony Fauci is 85 years old.
He is retired.
And yet here he was this week, hauled before a Senate committee to be entrapped into saying
something that could land him in prison.
A trap he chose not to fall into by invoking his fifth amendment right against self-incrimination
more than a hundred times when quizzed.
I think unto a question about whether there was a folder in front of him on the table.
It's just this spectacle, this kind of bizarre show trial of Tony Fauci.
Emily, what is the origin of it?
The COVID virus may or may not have been manufactured, but this was definitely manufactured.
What was going on here?
Right, I mean, the origin of this is that Fauci was the face of the American response to
COVID at a time when there was a lot of confusion and uncertainty.
He pushed for some restrictive measures and libertarians like Rand Paul are totally furious.
Think that people are still angry about some of it, which I think is true.
And that part is true.
And to have turned Fauci into the total scapegoat for this in a way that erases all of his
decades of public service, all the extremely important work he did many years ago to address
the AIDS crisis and turns him into this like potential criminal.
And then of course, there are the release of these diaries.
Fauci was keeping many, many pages that were hosted on government servers, which is totally
bananas that he did it that way.
And make him look really fatuous and like he was kind of celebrity hogging and extremely
concerned with his own fame.
So that's not helping at all.
But you know, mostly there's just something like really sad about this that we're at a
moment in American politics where this person who for all his flaws, and I got to say like
I'm not a big fan of Tony Fauci or his COVID response.
But that idea that he would be like basically strung up and threatened with, you know, being
criminally prosecuted just seems like some total extreme that is really reflective of
this moment in American politics.
And totally useless in terms of trying to figure out how to walk the cat back on what happened
with COVID and how to make things better for the next time.
We've never had any kind of real review to try to figure out what happened, right?
The government.
There's been lots of organizations that have tried to do that kind of review, but the American
government has knock on back in a like thorough, responsible way and had that kind of bipartisan
effort.
And it's going to make us less prepared the next time.
Just two toxic parts of the Fauci moment, which is on the one hand you have the incredibly
passionate people, feeling people had from the COVID era about like, don't you tell me
what to do with my life and with my kids in their schools?
And that legitimate anger, it's all channeled to him because he was the public face of it.
And because he, you know, particularly with respect to masks, it's been shown that
the public guidance they were giving on masks had some spin on it.
That wasn't consistent.
Like they were saying one thing publicly, but another thing privately about masks.
So there's some grounds for that feeling, but there's nothing more powerful than the
political feeling that you're being told what to do by people you don't think are, have
your best interest in heart.
So there's that.
Then there's the conspiracy theory part about the Wuhan lab leak that Paul thinks Fauci
knew came from the lab.
Although I'm going to say when I read the diaries and what he was saying in the diaries
and what he was saying publicly, there was not a huge distance, but you get conspiracy
theory plus personal sense of umbrage.
And that's all coming down on him at once.
Just to clarify something, John, when you're saying conspiracy theory, that part is that
Fauci knew you're not saying that like the origin theory of the lab is also a conspiracy
theory because at this point, that is, you know, a potential real explanation.
Oh, yeah.
So yes, I'm saying two things.
One, like there's still and David has has paid more attention than I am, but there
was still the debate whether COVID-19 came out of the lab or whether it came out of
the market.
And then when in reading his the wet market in Wuhan, in reading Fauci's journal diaries,
there's also which I completely forgot and the idea that it came from somewhere in nature
and then was accelerated at the market, which is a slightly different thing than it was
born in the market.
But I think there are two things with respect to Fauci.
One is that he funded the gain of function research that led to this and two is that because
of that or maybe not because of that, but that he covered up the origin of COVID-19 and
said it was from the market when he knew otherwise.
Then there's your legitimate question, Emily, which is where the hell this thing actually
start, where the whole thing is.
And did the gain of function research create vulnerabilities, which is also a legitimate
question that's gotten totally obfuscated by the conspiracy theories.
And Paul's claim is that Fauci lied about it, Fauci said we didn't fund through these
subsidiaries, gain of function research of the kind that you have accused us of doing.
And Paul said that wasn't telling the truth.
Just to clarify for any person, listen to this episode who somehow hasn't followed
this, because you're probably all followed at the reason they have hauled him before this
Senate panel was that President Biden gave him a blanket pardon for everything that he
did from 2011 to 2025 preemptively.
And so they're trying to create some other incident of criminal activity, and that would
be some form of perjury where he would say something in front of a Senate panel under oath
that contradicted something that he had said earlier.
And that could be a new crime that he could be prosecuted for.
I mean, it's really like when you think about trying to entrap somebody into a crime,
there's nothing more obvious because it wasn't.
There weren't sort of seeking legitimate information.
The whole idea was to gotcha this guy.
And this was a way that they tried to criminally charge James Comey, uh, low those many months
ago before we turned that turn to the criminal charges for seashells.
The diary release has actually gotten a ton of press.
I'm super ambivalent about it because on the one hand, I love reveling in in people's
vanity and shortcoming and like discovering that of course that wow, Tony Fauci liked
his fame.
He was a self-involved starfucker.
He liked to get phone calls from Barbara Streisand.
I mean, that's nice to know.
But unlike, oh yeah, and that makes him so different than the other people in that Senate
panel makes him so different from the people who are interrogating him.
Who by the way, just to jump in there.
Sorry, who then go through extravagant new kinds of buffoonery to get the attention of
the kind that they are criticizing him for wanting?
I'm sort of sympathetic to him having stuck this on a work computer.
I know he's being what?
Or look, he'd worked at NIH his whole life.
There is a way in which people co-mingle their personal and work lives, especially look
when they've worked at a single place.
My mother is a person who has never had any email address other than an email address
from the institution at which she worked.
I think my father, that was true too.
And I'm sure there are all sorts of things that my mother's put in her email because she
doesn't think about it.
She doesn't occur to her.
And like, he's an idiot for doing it.
But people, I guarantee you, Emily Bazelon, that somewhere near New York Times account,
you have said things about your children or you said things about your finances.
That's about you.
Actually, I do a lot of goths the big about you and my New York Times email.
Yes, goths exactly.
No, of course, you're right.
Of course, you're right.
We slip up in that way.
But 1100 pages of embarrassing personal diary is, I don't think, on my New York Times
This was a mistake.
It's a shame though, because whether you rightly or wrongly, you want officials like this
to use diaries and in the middle of a total pale male insane process, you want a record.
You both for their own cognitive benefit, but also for mankind.
Can I just say one other thing?
Imagine applying the level of rigor, although we've established that this is not actual
genuine rigor packed by critical thinking.
But I mean, the asymmetry of concern about Fauci versus any of the other actors, particularly
the president, either on anything, but particularly with respect to the president's behavior with
respect to COVID, the asymmetry of concern is striking.
Can I ask one last question about this, which is, how much of the elder abuse of Fauci
do you think stems from?
Well, so there are different factors.
Rand Paul's personal vendetta, but also the kind of sense that he was dishonest about
the origins of COVID.
But also how much of it is about just this real distaste for resentment of elites and experts
that has pervaded the Republican Party recently.
And I feel like Fauci has come to stand in for expertise.
He is the scapegoat for all expertise now.
And expertise is something that the Republican Party is really stands against.
Well, and especially public health expertise, right?
And then you can try to tap into this deeper skepticism, which I think is still lingering
from COVID about school closures.
Yes, legitimately.
Legitimately.
Legitimately, totally.
Right.
This is where I become sympathetic.
Right.
And also the idea that in the beginning, the advice about masks was spun.
Like you were saying before, it was initially the idea of like, no, you don't need a mask
because they were trying to make sure there would be enough masks for the first responder
people.
And actually, they did.
And then they were telling everyone to use masks and a lot of the masks were ineffective.
And that also turned out to be, it seems very paternalistic.
Like the public health people were not being straight with us the whole time.
And I think that if you're trying to be really fair and I close my eyes and I go back to
the beginning, there was so much that was unknown in the beginning and so much fear.
And I understand the ultra caution in the very beginning.
But at least where I live, it lasted for an ordinary amount of time.
And I think there is a lot of like libertarian latent rage or resentment about that.
And so in that sense, like Fauci is a good political target.
It's just that this is such a profoundly unseurious way of addressing all of this because like
I said, we don't have a sort of really cogent government review.
We have this spectacle of rampal just lashing out.
And maybe actually government review, given the state of government, it's probably not
so, you know, probably wouldn't get as much anyway.
But also we just just one, I mean, I go back to the review, you know, that was done in
which President Trump was labeled a comorbidity with respect to the COVID response.
But we should just throw in the historical populist distaste for experts and pointy headed professors
and scientists.
That's a, there's a strong strain of that in American life.
But also, I mean, George Wallace used to go on at length in his speeches and get a real
populist support from people on both sides of the aisle with that critique.
This episode is presented by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
We're watching the devastating consequences of policy decisions play out in real time.
The Trump administrations backers in Congress are trying to permanently defund Planned Parenthood,
an effort to shut down health centers and block patient care like wellness exams, cancer
screenings, and more across the country, especially for those with low incomes.
If you want to do something concrete to help, visit plannedparenthood.org slash defend.
Your gift builds a future where everyone can get the care they need and deserve.
Today shows brought to you by Vanguard to all the financial advisors listening.
Let's talk bonds for a minute.
Capturing value and fixed income is not easy.
Bond markets are massive, murky, and let's be real.
Lots of firms throw a couple of flashy funds your way and call it a day, but not Vanguard.
Vanguard bonds are institutional quality.
Institutional quality isn't a tagline.
It's a commitment to your clients.
It means top grade products across the board.
The lineup includes over 80 bond funds that are actively managed by 200-person global
squad of sector specialists, analysts, and traders.
Lots of firms love to highlight their star portfolio managers, like it's all about that
one brilliant mind making the magic happen.
Vanguard's philosophy is a little different.
They believe the best active strategy shouldn't be locked away with one person.
They should be shared across the team.
That way, every client benefits from the collective brainpower, not just one individual's
take.
So if you're looking to give your clients consistent results year in and year out, go see
the record for yourself at vanguard.com slash audio.
That's vanguard.com slash audio, all investing in subject to risk, vanguard marketing corporation
distributor.
Also, in the endless night of perpetual unrest or nothing is ever completed,
firms are old friend, Miffa Prestone, the FDA approved medicine for medication abortion.
Back in the news for several reasons this week, first, Republican senators are trying to
pressure attorney general, acting attorney general attorney general nominee Todd Blanche
to take a more aggressive stance against it.
He's confirmed as AG.
Second, a federal judge in Virginia declared various Biden-era FDA restrictions on Miffa
Prestone to be unnecessary and burdensome and they should be lifted.
And finally, young anti-abortion conservatives rolled out a fantastical new line of attack
against the medicine, which is the thing that I'm most interested in.
But let's start, Emily, with the judges ruling, what did he find about Miffa Prestone?
What are the FDA regulations?
He says are unnecessary?
Are they unnecessary?
But nothing's going to happen anyway, right?
Yeah, so there are competing court challenges about FDA of approval of a Miffa Prestone and
all the rules around Miffa Prestone.
This is a case that an abortion clinic brought Holwoman's health saying that the rules
remain too restrictive.
That basically there's a lot of burdensome paperwork that's still in place from 2023 revisions
that the Biden administration took in place, put in place.
And so the idea is that the FDA is still creating kind of extra bureaucracy that is unnecessary
and has nothing to do with making sure that patients safely and effectively take Miffa
Prestone.
And they got a district court ruling in their favor.
The competing court challenges, which are trying to either eliminate FDA approval of
Miffa Prestone altogether or roll it back to the time when you had to have in-person visits
that's from 2016 and 2020.
Those are cases that conservative states are bringing in Texas emissory.
So there's just a bunch of different Miffa Prestone cases kind of percolating up pointing
in different directions.
And like eventually we'll see what happens with that.
That's like sort of on slow, simmer in most senses.
And then there are these, I think, hotter questions about the waste water, the idea that people
are drinking abortions, which we can certainly talk about.
And then also this demand of Todd Blant, the Justice Department actually do something about
prosecuting people for prescribing abortion pills across state lines.
And I guess just to back up a second and unify some of this, what's really the fundamental
dynamic here is that before the 2024 elections, if you go back to the Heritage Foundation's
Project 2025 and this idea of like what the next conservative president would do, there
were a lot of ideas about restricting abortion because one of the deep frustrations of abortion
opponents since the Supreme Court overturned Row in 2022 is that the number of abortions
is slightly risen across the country.
And that's largely because abortion pills are getting mailed into states with vans.
And if you are an abortion opponent, that is very frustrating and upsetting to you.
And so they put all these from their point of view, I like potent ideas into Project 2025
and they have gotten none of them because Donald Trump is not interested in any of this.
He thinks he's done.
He gave the anti abortion lobby the end of Roe v. Wade by appointing three Supreme Court
justices.
He wants to be thanked for that.
And he is not interested in running any political risks for furthering their agenda and their
mad.
They are like they want to think of themselves as an important constituency and they want
some things.
And so everything that's happening kind of ties into like their strategies of trying to
lift this issue back up because right now nobody is really talking about it and nobody
really cares.
It seems in the Trump administration that they're not getting what they want.
So let's turn to this wastewater question.
The new argument that's being made by students for life of America and organization I had not
heard of but I'm sure Emily has what is the claim that they are making?
Well, so it's not actually new.
So students for life of America is very much focused on college campuses and recruiting
young people and students into the movement.
There are sort of like a turning point USA but anti abortion organization that's all about
college organizing.
And so back in 2017 they had this idea like, okay, lots of young people care about the
environment.
What if we start talking about this idea that there is Mifapristone and abortion drugs
in the water and that people are drinking other people's abortions?
That was their line, right?
And it is really, really scientifically implausible that this is like health threat but it's
like a gross idea, right?
I think the grossness, the idea of contamination from abortion pills was like the initial hook.
And they really pushed this for a long time more kind of from like a crunchy kind of like
trying to recruit students on the left, I think.
And then RFK Jr. gets appointed to be the head of the Department of Health and Human Services
and he cares a lot about contaminating chemicals, right?
Not this chemical.
But the other ones like he is really into the idea that there are threats in the water.
And one of the things that RFK Jr. talks about with a great deal of passion is the problem
of endocrine disruptors, plastics that are he thinks causing sperm rates and fertility
rates to decline.
He cares about this and it is possible that there is something in like BPA plastics that
is causing these kinds of problems.
It's not like nailed down science but the idea that endocrine disruptors are linked
to declining fertility rates is not a crazy idea and it's something that RFK Jr. cares
about.
So then you have students for life of America kind of latching on to this and trying to
also make it about drinking abortion in the water and Mifapristone, even though Mifapristone
has a different chemical composition, it works in a different way.
It's sort of like potentially related enough that they went down this path and have tried
to make it attractive to the Maha movement, the Make America Healthy Again movement.
It hasn't really gotten any lift off so far.
So I think again they're frustrated and so you saw them release a study this week that
they claimed with peer reviewed, they released it through an anti-abortion journal.
It's done by anti-abortion researchers but they're trying to show that there's something
to study here that the EPA should put Mifapristone on a list of what it calls contaminant chemicals
and start actually measuring it in the water.
The study has all kinds of problems but that's the sort of pathway and the strategy.
May I ask you Emily about Todd Blanch in his confirmation hearings was pressed by Senator
Holly and Senator Cruz about looking at and I know you can't wait to talk about this.
The Comstocks.
Yes, yes, the Comstocks.
Would you explain what DOJ finding from the Biden era they would like reversed and what's
the chance that Blanch might do it?
We should note as of Thursday that Blanch's confirmation hearing in the Judiciary Committee
was delayed because two senators, Cornyn and Tillis, would like to get his assurances
that the Slusch Fund created out of the Duffy and weird IRS agreement with the president
to drop the laws who'd against the IRS that that's now been delayed because Blanch won't
give them the assurances that they want which suggests that there is something to their
concern that the Slusch Fund didn't really did.
Seriously.
Yes, so again, this is about the frustration of the anti-abortion groups.
The Comstock Act is this 1872 law passed by like super Puritan crusader, Anthony Comstock.
It really was like his beat.
It's passed by Congress, Emily.
It was like a pass by.
Sorry, good point.
It was passed by.
I mean, the United States Congress passed the bill and it was signed by the president.
So, totally fair.
And actually they did it with like very little debate and just kind of waved it through
because Anthony Comstock was very successful at convincing them that obscenity, that like
racy playing cards and you know the 1872 version of pornography or like a serious threat.
There was a big panic over that and that's the origin of this law which also talked about
making it a crime to mail or send through any kind of delivery carrier, any item related
to abortion.
So the Comstock Act, this part of it remains on the books.
And it's really speaking like you mail anything related to an abortion with the intent of
an abortion and it's a crime.
So we haven't enforced this law in any way, shape or form for many decades, but it sits
there.
It's like a loaded gun if you are an abortion opponent.
And the Biden administration issued an opinion within the Justice Department through the Office
of Legal Counsel.
That's like the internal part of the Justice Department that says like what the government's
approach to laws is going to be, that says the Biden DOJ said we're not prosecuting anyone
under the Comstock Act because in order to have a prosecution you'd have to show that
the purpose of mailing or sending this abortion drug or item is unlawful.
And that's too hard to prove.
Most abortion related items are being mailed for lawful purposes and so we're not doing
this.
And I mean, many people, including me, expected the Trump DOJ to revoke that opinion.
It just seems like an obvious move that you would make.
And revoking that opinion could pose a real threat.
The companies that manufacture and distribute Mifapristone and Misa Prostle, the second abortion
drug, which is also in theory covered by the Comstock Act.
These companies could look at that and say wait a second.
Like we're no longer assured that there won't be criminal liability for mailing these drugs.
And so we're not going to ship them anymore.
I don't know that that would happen if they revoked the DOJ guidance, but the DOJ guidance
is helpful for them continuing to do business.
And yet no one's made any kind of move to revoke this guidance.
And also the Trump DOJ has had zero, I would say negative interest in trying to prosecute
anybody for mailing Mifapristone and Misa Prostle or anything else connected to abortion
across state lines.
Or just haven't done that at all because they, I think it's a political nonstarter.
Again, not something Donald Trump has interest in using any political capital for.
So if you're Josh Holley and Ted Cruz and you're supposed to be a committed anti-abortion
lawmaker, this is like exactly a thing that you would press Todd Blanche on.
And what Blanche said was that he would look into it.
Before we leave this, I just want to go back to the wastewater abortion question because
one of the things that really gets my go, I mean hypocrisy is not a crime.
You're allowed to be as hypocritical as you want.
And that is, that's your right as a human being.
It's your right as a president.
It's your right whoever you want.
But the idea that this administration, which has been extremely cavalier about enforcing
things like Clean Water Act, Clean Air, is not shown any interest.
I mean, our kid junior perhaps slightly to the contrary, but even there, there's been
very little actual thing that's happened.
But they are not worried about the pesticides that are in your water or the cyanide that's
in your water, any number of other things that are befowing our water.
But suddenly we've discovered something.
There is this one thing that's befowing our water that we need to investigate.
And it reminds me of that effort.
Trump's very successful effort to stop offshore wind farms.
And he's one reason, one way they've been able to stop offshore wind farms is by invoking
risks to birds and saying, oh, these birds are poor birds are threatened.
And like they could give a shit about the birds when the birds are flying over land or
when the birds are flying anywhere other than near these windmills.
It's just like, oh, we can, if we can use this excuse, these environmental laws that
are on the books pretextually to take out this thing that we don't want for cultural
and political reasons, we're going to do it.
And just it just annoys me.
Yeah, that's a totally good analogy to draw.
And it's also about how it possible it is to confuse people once you make it a public
health threat, right?
And there is this whole set of, again, like you can understand why people in the maha
movement are concerned about public health.
Like there are risks from environmental factors to public health.
Like that is broadly true.
And then people get really uncertain about how to deal with these kind of unsettled scientific
questions.
And so yeah, sure, let's try to throw Mifapristone into the mix here, even though, you know,
when you look at the actual science of like how many parts per million could possibly
be in the water from people excreting it, like it's all bananas.
But the idea of it, you're just like throwing up a lot of chaff.
And yes, pretending that you have real environmental concerns.
I wonder if you could place adjacent to that, the administration's new double digit tariffs,
which have been placed on more than 60 companies, 80 countries citing the failures of those
countries to enforce a ban on imports produced by forced and child labor.
Like do they really feel a deep concern about child and forced labor?
Not really.
They're using it as a pretext for reanimating the president's tariff scheme.
I think if I wrote a book about the Trump administration, it might be called pretext.
But I'm not going to do that.
No worries.
Let us go to cocktail chatter when Emily, you're drinking not abortions, but a delicious
cocktail.
What are you going to be chattering about to Dr. Bazelon?
I'm sort of staying on the theme of our last topic.
I read such a good piece this week in Mother Jones by the writer Julia Lurie.
It's called Me Myself and IUDs.
And it's a really nuanced look at hormonal birth control.
This is something I've been looking into my book.
And Julia just did such a good job with this topic.
It's hard to talk about because we need hormonal birth control.
It's been really important for many things, especially women's equality, to have really
effective birth control.
It is also true that hormonal birth control, both from oral contraception and in a smaller
number of cases, IUDs, can have side effects for women that are serious.
People talk about less libido, struggling with depression and weight gain.
Those are just like three of the things people are concerned about.
And again, it doesn't affect that many people.
And Julia did a really good job of being careful throughout her article at a caveat, what
she was saying.
But it is also true that it's not zero people.
And I think some of the response of the medical establishment has been to kind of hand wave
about a lot of the complaints women have because for good reason, the medical establishment
doesn't want people to think that they have to get off of this birth control.
Because for most women, it is successful and it's such an important tool.
And the IUD in particular has a very, very tiny failure rate.
So there are just all these interesting and important questions here of thinking about
how women or even men, there is research on that, could have better birth control with
fewer side effects while we also don't destabilize people's use of birth control.
Because for whatever the side effects of hormonal birth control is, it is also true that having
an unplanned pregnancy is its own important consequence in people's lives.
So I recommend this piece.
Me, myself and the IUD, Julia Lurie, Mother Jones.
J.D.
What is your chatter?
My chatter is based on a story that I was introduced to by Katki.org, which we should all, you know,
just haven't heard that name for a long time.
I know, but it's a good reminder that it's out there doing great work, Jason Katki.
Anyway, it was based on an article in Space Daily.
What it wrote about was something we were all probably familiar with, but still it was
just wonderful, which is that after six months aboard the International Space Station, the
astronaut, some of them reported when they come back to Earth, having this Space Daily
called a jet lag of the self, where essentially they felt like participants in their own lives.
It's at down to dinner and feel like a guess.
They drive a familiar street as though they were piloting it.
And that basically this lingered a lot longer.
We know about the feeling that astronauts have reported, which is when they're up there,
they look down and have this very strong sense of awe and sense of human unity and the
fragility of the planet and that that overview effect, as it's called, is pretty well reported.
What I was intrigued by this lingering thing, which is that when you come back, your
view of the planet and your own participation in your own life, has this kind of split
feeling for a little while until you reintegrate.
My chatter, two chatters.
One, I just want to spend one second remembering one of my musical, not pantheon, but somebody
I really admired Glenn Hansard, died in apparently a motorcycle accident in Ireland this
week.
And if you've ever seen the movie once, he is the protagonist in the movie once, which
is really truly one of my favorite movies ever made.
And I think there's a particular scene in that movie.
And if you've seen the movie, you know what it is that is, I think, truly, like the
most moving musical scene I can think of in a movie.
Also wonderful.
So I'll track that movie.
And just a wonderful soundtrack.
And then he created a lot of great music with a band called The Frames and then The
Swel season, which was a sort of he and the his co-star in once, Marketa or Glova, toured
together with the swell season.
I saw them once.
It was wonderful.
He went Shane McGowan of the pokes, died.
Glenn Hansard kind of almost emseed the funeral, the celebratory funeral concert and he was
so good in that.
And he was just like this gigantic red-headed goof, wonderful singer, incredible voice, just
a great storyteller and the bummer, real bummer.
You know him, John, I take it.
Oh yeah, yeah, yeah.
And it was my Instagram feed, which you know is tuned to, not only did I follow him, but
then like everybody I followed and all the fan pages of every day I followed had tributes.
And so for the entire day yesterday, it was just one wave after another of tributes and
live performances.
And yeah, it was really an outpouring of affection for him.
Yeah.
And nothing else, just see the movie once.
But my actual chatter, I want to talk about another podcast I did this week with another
member of the GFES family.
I had the enormous pleasure of talking to Eli Sabin, Emily's son on my other podcast,
your city could be better.
Eli Sabin is a politician in Connecticut.
He was an alder in the city of New Haven.
He is now running for state rep.
In fact, his primary is coming up just in 10 days on August 11th.
And Eli sat down to talk about zoning, such a boring subject that is so interesting.
And Eli Pioneer led caused a complete reform of the zoning in downtown New Haven.
And he talked about why that was, how he accomplished it, what he was doing, what the purpose
was, super duper fun conversation.
And as you would expect, given that he is the child of one Emily Baselon, he's just
engaging and smart and clears a bell about everything he's talking about.
So check that out on your city could be better than he'd talking to Eli Sabin.
Listeners, you've got chatters.
Please email them to us at gaffest.
At slide.com.
Please email us your chatter.
You've got something interesting, something delightful has happened to you.
You read something, sent them to us at gaffest.com.
And our listener chatter this week comes from Craig.
Hi gaffest listeners.
This is Craig Kujalla from Washington, DC.
My chatter is about a significant event that occurred this month in the world of Acapella.
Over 50 of the best barbershop quartets in the world competed at the International Convention
of the Barbershop Harmony Society, something that,
except during the pandemic, has happened annually since 1938.
The traditionally all-male organization, however, opened membership to all people in 2018.
And for the first time in the society's 88-year history, this year's gold medal winning
quartet was comprised of four women.
GQ, short for girls quartet, had placed in the top five before, but never won the gold.
Three of its members are kindergarten or elementary school music teachers.
Their final performance in the contest, a cover of Maddy Zom's song, Mothers and Daughters,
is poignant, achingly beautiful, and an excellent example of modern, unaccompanied four-part
close harmony singing, the classic American art form that is barbershop.
It just might be the best six minutes you spend all day.
Check it out on YouTube.
Thanks.
Craig, thank you.
That's not the only podcast that's late this week.
We're not the only podcast that's late this week, I should say.
Late Parade has a new episode out about Jay-Z.
And Chris Malanfi is just such a great podcaster.
His hit parade is so fun, and he traces the decades-long history of Jay-Z as a hitmaker.
And it's the run this town edition of Hit Parade.
Check it out.
That is all for our episode this week, but we also have a bonus episode in your feed.
We're interviewing.
We've already interviewed, in fact.
NYCDSA Co-Chair Grace Mauser.
She's really interesting.
Smart.
You know, one of the leaders of this incredibly successful political movement on the left.
That is only for Slate Plus members, though, so you should subscribe to Slate Plus.
Go to the political.gov.s show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify or visit slate.com slash
gavvestplus.
And you will get access to that.
Our bonus episodes every week, as well as lots of other stuff.
You'll never hit the paywall on the Slate site and much more.
That's our show for today.
The Political Gav Fest is produced by Nina Porzuki, our researchers Emily Ditto.
Our theme music is by they might be Giants, Ben Richman, a senior director for podcast
operations, Miele Bell, as executive producer of Slate podcast, Florey Fry is at Dr. Chief
of Slate for Emily Baszlant, and John Dickerson and David Plott.
Thanks for listening.
Talk to you next week.
This episode is presented by the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.
We're watching the devastating consequences of policy decisions play out in real time.
The Trump administration's backers in Congress are trying to permanently defund Planned
Parenthood, an effort to shut down health centers and block patient care like wellness exams,
cancer screenings, and more across the country, especially for those with low incomes.
If you want to do something concrete to help, visit PlannedParenthood.org slash defend.
Your gift builds a future where everyone can get the care they need and deserve.
Most people never think they'll need a civil rights attorney until the day they do.
As communities across the country face growing abuses of power from police and federal law
enforcement, people are left to face impossible systems alone.
The National Police Accountability Project supports attorneys challenging these abuses through
litigation and nationwide collaboration.
If you believe no one should face abuse of power alone, help support the people doing
this work every day.
Support the fight.
Donate at nationalpoliceaccountability.org.