Grok Bot Finally Makes AI Agents Easy

The promise of AI agents might finally be becoming a reality.

At the beginning of this year, it was clear that 2026 was going to be the year of agents.

The combination of the advancement of models plus harnesses meant that around the turn of this year,

it was clear that some critical inflection point had been reached,

and people came into January racing to uncover all of the new capabilities

that tools like Cloud Code and OpenAI's Codex made available to them.

When the agent excitement really popped off, however, was with the introduction of OpenClaw.

With OpenClaw, people were able to spin up entire teams of agents,

chief of staffs, researchers, writers, anything you could imagine and have them actually

coordinate and interact with one another, doing big chunks of your work,

and coordinated all through easy chat interfaces like Telegram or WhatsApp.

The problem was, of course, that it was extremely technically complex and difficult to do so.

We even dropped an entire course, CloudCamp, just to help people figure that out.

And throughout the year, there have been some attempts to make those sort of interfaces for

agentic work more straightforward for broader adoption. Yet none of them have really hit the mark.

Something that with this week's introduction of Grocbot, that has all changed.

Grocbot allows users to spin up multiple agents for different tasks.

You can give them access to whatever systems they need, and they go off and do work while you watch,

or while you're doing other things. It's one of the first products from the combined efforts

of cursor and SpaceX AI, and the companies even say that the bots will learn and get better over time.

So, is this the agent platform that we've been waiting for?

The agent platform that can bring the capabilities of agentic working to a much wider array of people?

Let's find out.

The AI Daily Brief is a daily podcast and video about the most important news and discussions in AI.

All right, friends, quick announcements before we dive in. First of all, thank you to today's

sponsors KPMG, Blitzie, Section, and HyperAgent. To get an ad free version of the show,

you can go to patreon.com slash AI Daily Brief, or you can subscribe and upload podcasts.

To learn more about sponsoring the show, send us a note at sponsors at AIDailyBreathe.ai,

or you can actually visit the website at AIDailyBreathe.ai and click around to the sponsor section.

While you're on AIDailyBreathe.ai, you can also find the complete companion to each episode.

Every single episode is broken down into shareable chunks, meaning that if there's just one quote or

some number that you want to share with a colleague, it's probably there waiting for you.

You can also sign up to our newsletter from there, so again, AIDailyBreathe.ai.

With that, though, let's first cruise through the headlines and then talk about this exciting new release of Grocbot.

We kick off today with a story that has gotten enough attention that it honestly might make it into

a main later this week. Anthropic has stirred up huge amounts of controversy by introducing

watermarks for AI-generated text. As of this month, all new Anthropic models will now include

invisible watermarks in their generations. Anthropic models will be able to detect the watermarks

to help identify AI-generated content, and Anthropic will support third-party AI detectors to do

the same. This new policy is part of Anthropics commitment to the EU Code of Practice on AI-generated

content part of the EU AI Act. Now, the controversial part is that Anthropic is not just including

watermarks in images or videos to combat the harms of deepfakes as other companies have done.

Instead, they're embedding the watermarks in all-generated text, and importantly, it is not in

the metadata, but instead the watermark is somehow included in the text itself. Anthropic claims,

you won't see it, and it doesn't change the meaning, quality, or readability of Claude's response.

Because the watermark is part of the text, it will travel with the text when it's copied and

pasted elsewhere, and may persist through some editing. The policy is being applied to all models

in all regions, so even if you're not in the EU, your Claude outputs will still be watermarked.

Folks were very skeptical that Anthropic can achieve this without degrading the quality of the

outputs. Right, Zorf? The watermark will basically be the statistical signature or word choice of

the models, Anthropic claims this won't affect quality, but this seems non-obvious given that they'll

be constraining the model sampling and biasing token choice, and potentially making the model less

creative and inventive downstream. The EU does it again. Now, it would be hard to describe in just

a couple of tweets how upset people are about this, recognizing that this is not just for regular

word writing, but also for code writing, developer Nick Dovos wrote, Claude adding invisible watermarks

inside my codebase, total BS, diabolical precedent to be setting, what's he ever even doing here?

Simon Smith writes,

Question about Anthropics watermarker, if I task Claude with doing research and that research

requires quoting something like a legal document, will the quote be subtly changed from the source

to introduce the watermark? Because that's terrifying. If not, how can we be sure?

And while Andrew Kern points out that Gemini has been doing something like this since 2024,

that didn't make people feel much better. Now, this is a debate that's worthy of more than just

a headlines, but for now, that's the primer on the topic, and I am sure it is not the last that we

will be hearing about this. Speaking of Google, the company has announced that they have reached a

billion users for the Gemini app. CEO Sundar Pichai announced the milestone on Tuesday posting,

1 billion plus people are now using the Gemini app every month to spark new ideas and get things

done. It's our fastest growing product ever and our 14th to hit the 1 billion user mark.

Now, some are a bit skeptical of this, given that Gemini is integrated into Search, YouTube,

and other platforms, but the Verge confirmed that this week's Billion user milestone

applies specifically to the Gemini app. Google has begun pre-installing Gemini onto Android

handsets, but those users still need to engage with the app to be included in these numbers.

Google also shares some interesting details about how users are interacting with their chatbot.

63% of users are using the voice interface, demonstrating how eager people are to ditch the

keyboard. Gemini has also retained massive volume for their image model, with users generating

150 million images per day. What's really interesting is what this says about the state of models.

Ogazirkan points out that Google doesn't have an AI model in the top 10 right now.

Suggesting, this means what wins in consumer markets isn't the product its distribution,

but you also have to think that a lot of those billion users have no idea what they're missing,

given that all of their AI use is stuck in a model that is at this point at least six months

behind the frontier. Now, staying on the product side for a minute, Manus is returning as an

independent company after finalizing their split with Meta. Manus was acquired by Meta for

two billion in December, but in the following months Chinese officials scrutinized the deal

and in April ordered it to be unwound. The national security concern it seemed was that the big

payday would encourage more Chinese startups and talent to seek an exit in the west.

In the interim, there has been swirling discussion on how Manus will raise the money to repay Meta,

given that the funds had already been distributed to investors. On Tuesday, however, Manus announced

that they'll soon return as an independent company serving their millions of users.

However, to complete their separation from Meta, they need to delete some user data generated

after December 29th. They advised all users to back up their data ahead of the transition

date on August 23rd and said that independent systems will be online from August 25th.

Now, the big question is whether this is a fresh start for Manus that will let them get back

in the agent race. In a post on X, they wrote,

as we look ahead, we couldn't be more excited by the future, or preparing a series of new features

that will push the boundaries of what's possible for general AI agents once again.

And frankly, while it's reasonable to be skeptical, you got to think that the innovation that

they will pursue now as their backs are against the wall and as they remain independent

is a lot more than what we would have seen from inside the behemoth that is Meta.

As Peter Corbett points out, going back to $0.00 ARR and starting again is going to make for an

interesting case study. Now, on the topic of hot segments of the AI industry, open routers $10

billion dollar price tag has apparently triggered a bidding war across the router segment.

The information reports that interest in token router acquisitions is off the charts,

with multiple large software companies looking to add the infrastructure to their stack.

Snowflake is reportedly in the market alongside base 10, cloud flare, and Vercel.

And the interest is reaching some very small startups in the space.

Tibo JaiGu, the CEO of Requestly, said that his five-person startup has fielded interest from 25

different companies looking to invest, acquire, or partner with Requestly.

Dean May of Miri Adventures Partners, which has a small token router play in his portfolio,

thinks it's a seller's market, commenting, it would be unwise for data infrastructure players

and hyper-scalers not to entertain acquisitions right now.

Ari JaiGu, the co-founder of token router Concentrade AI, said that he's been approached by seven

companies so far this month, commenting, we've been unbelievably popular for the past two weeks

in a way that I could have never imagined before. In other words, it seems at this moment

that the large companies and incumbents have decided that even if they could build this sort of

functionality, the need for speed trumps all and it is time to buy. Moving over to markets for a

moment, another story which could easily be an entire main. Invidia is putting together a 500

billion dollar platform to help improve the financing landscape for data centers.

Announced on Monday, the platform will provide financing from investment banking and private

credit giants, including Apollo, BlackRock, and Blackstone. These firms will provide credit to

Neo Clouds to help fuel the data center build out. The details of the arrangement aren't entirely clear,

but it appears the approach could bring together multiple lenders to standardize data center debt.

It also appears that Nvidia GPUs will be accepted as collateral and revenue sharing could be

part of the arrangement. In a press release, Jensen Huang said, Nvidia has reached an important

milestone. We began by building chips. Today we are helping create a new class of productive

investible infrastructure, AI factories. In AI, compute is revenue. Nvidia compute is uniquely

suited for this role. It is broadly adopted, flexible across models and workloads,

fungible and transferable across customers and operators. These financing platforms will help

customers access scarce compute at scale and build the AI factories that will power every industry

and country in the age of AI. In a CNBC interview, Huang presented this as a new paradigm for AI

financing, saying, this is really the first time that technology chips have become an investible

asset class. These are revenue generating assets now. They're productive, they're long lived,

they're fungible, they're flexible. Now of course, for the bears who are worried about circular

funding, this is just pouring absolute gasoline on the fires of their concerns, but for other more

neutral market actors, the move seems to be paying dividends. Tuesday saw Nvidia's credit

close, implying a lower risk of default, and their bonds also rallied, reducing the implied

interest rate for the next round of borrowing. So at least when it comes to Nvidia themselves,

essentially the market interpreted the new vehicle as Nvidia spreading the risk of losses

across multiple other parties. If we see an AI slowdown, investors no longer expect Nvidia to

take a double hit from reduced revenue and bad debt from data centers. Selmauro, the CIO at

Coherence Credit Strategy, said, nobody knew what the $500 billion potential financing meant.

Today, you have an idea that they're getting everybody involved in that their exposure isn't

as serious as investors originally feared. Lastly, today, keeping track of things in Washington,

Senator Bernie Sanders has officially joined the POS movement and is calling on Sam Altman,

Dario Amade and Mark Zuckerberg to do the same. In a letter to the trio, he wrote,

almost every day, there is a new story about how your companies are losing control of the AI

technology you are developing with potentially cataclysmic results. He referenced the recent

scientific research about using AI to create novel viruses as the prime example, claiming

this type of development in the wrong hands could lead to new bio-weapons that result in the deaths

of tens of millions of people. This is, of course, despite the actual research having no connection to

any of these three companies and using a completely different type of AI to their LLMs.

But for the sake of Sanders' argument, it's all AI. Sanders also referenced the hugging-face hack

arguing it was a clear violation of federal law. And leaving a letter on a slightly threatening note,

Sanders concluded, let me be very clear, if you do not take appropriate action now, my colleagues

and I in the Senate will. Just another example of the temperature rising in Washington for now,

though that is going to do it for today's headlines. Next up, the main episode.

If you're leading AI inside an enterprise, you already know that the gap right now isn't

capability but execution. That's why KPMG's You Can With AI is back with a new season featuring

conversations with leaders like Serozget Chatterjee of Emma, Mejabeeb of Ryder,

McKesson CIO, Ellery Fisher, and others focused on practical execution.

What's working, what's not, and what it actually takes to move from pilots to real-scaled impact

across strategy, data readiness, governance, workforce, and value.

And of course, it's co-hosted by me, Nathaniel Wittemore. Go listen and subscribe at www.kPMG.us-AI-podcasts.

That's www.kPMG.us-AI-podcasts.

Here's why most legacy modernization projects fail. The AI doing the work can't understand

code bases at scale. It sees a small slice of context, examines syntax, and misses years of

decisions distributed across the global application ecosystem. Blitzie solves this the way it solves

everything. Grounded in your code before any migration begins, Blitzie's agents reverse

engineer the entire legacy system into a persistent knowledge graph. Every dependency, every

constraint, every piece of tribal knowledge that used to live in one engineer's head.

From that understanding, Blitzie autonomously executes language migrations,

framework upgrades, and monolith to microservices transformations, all validated and to end.

One Blitzie customer modernized a $10 million monolithic insurance stack in 16 weeks

against a 137-week baseline with coding agents. That's 9x compression.

Retire technical debt while accelerating your roadmap. See how at Blitzie.com. That's B-L-I-T-Z-Y.com.

Here's a harsh truth. Your company is probably spending thousands or millions of dollars on AI

tools that are being massively underutilized. Half of companies have AI tools, but only 12% use

them for business value. Most employees are still using AI to summarize meeting notes. If you're

the one responsible for AI adoption at your company, you need section. Section is a platform that helps

you manage AI transformation across your entire organization. It coaches employees on real use

cases, tracks who's using AI for business impact, and shows you exactly where AI is and isn't

creating value. The result? You go from rolling out tools to driving measurable AI value.

Your employees move from meeting summaries to solving actual business problems,

and you can prove the ROI. Stop guessing if your AI investment is working. Check out section at

sectionai.com. That's SEC T-I-O-N-A-I dot com. This episode of the AI Daily Brief is brought to you

by HyperAgent, where you run fleets of agents your team can manage together. New users get $1000

in inference. Forget local agents and chat workflows waiting on your laptop to be prompted. HyperAgent

deploys always on agents in the cloud, doing real work across the tools your team already uses.

Marketing's agent turns competitor moves into landing pages. Sales is agent and reaches leads,

drafts emails, and updates the CRM. Ops agent chases the paperwork and tracks the budget. Every agent

has access to shared context and follows your rules about scope and approvals. It's time you add

agents that feel like teammates. Higher yours at HyperAgent built by the team at AirTable.

Claim your $1000 in inference at hyperagent.com slash AI Daily Brief.

Welcome back to the AI Daily Brief. I genuinely don't remember the last time I saw people as excited

about a product announcement, as people have been about the newly announced GROCKBOT.

And when push comes to shove, I think the reason why is pretty simple. Ever since OpenClaw came out

at the beginning of the year, people have been looking for ways to build and deploy agents on their

behalf, ideally in a simpler way than what that sort of technically complex system required.

There have been a variety of shots on that goal, but nothing is really stuck. But first impressions

suggest that that's what GROCKBOT might be. The interface for interacting with GROCKBOT looks

frankly like Telegram, which is of course where most people were interacting with OpenClaw when

it first came out. To get started, you can either create a new bot, or you can interact with a

bot that you've already initiated. You interface with your GROCKBOTs through the chat window,

exactly as you had with OpenClaw, and frankly, exactly as you do with Cloud or Codex.

And GROCKBOTs work in the background in their own virtual computer, meaning you can keep working

while the task is running on the cloud. It's also capable of using its computer through human

interfaces, so it can sign into web apps and operate software without APIs. When it needs

you to authorize something, it'll simply bring up that window, and have you sign in on its virtual

machine in the same way that you would on yours. GROCKBOT is of course powered by the family of

XAI models, which are once again getting competitive, meaning that while it might not be as good as

fable or 5-6 soul on certain tasks, the agent likely will be good enough to handle a wide range of

work tasks and to end. In fact, as we'll see, SpaceX has been testing GROCKBOT internally, and it

is basically taken over as a core work tool. Now, none of this is net new functionality, but the

way that they've put together the elements in the ease of use has made a huge leap. The interface,

again, that simple telegram style interface abstracts all the complexity away, and that includes

the native integration of a lot of advanced features that have been difficult to use or disappointing

in other products. For example, you can run multiple bots at the same time, but rather than being

overwhelming, the Interbot messaging system and clean interface makes it feel way more achievable

to manage a team of agents. You can even build a whole team of agents, each with a specific role

in individual name. Your GROCKBOTs can coordinate with one another, allowing them to function like a

single integrated agentic system. And while GROCKBOT doesn't currently live in workplace

messaging apps like Slack or Microsoft Teams, you can set them up to work together across individuals

accounts, integrating a promise that's been around with us since the days of RPA, because the GROCKBOT

is at core a computer use bot using its virtual machine, you can really easily train it on common

workflows by asking it simply to follow along the next time you do a particular task. SpaceX AI

says that the bot will watch the steps and remember how the work gets done, saving the workflow

as a routine. You can also iterate on this process providing corrections that improve the bots

workflow, kind of like being able to create a skill with a screen recording but much more native.

The company says that the GROCKBOTs will learn over time and get better, adjusting things like

writing style or handling of edge cases or even knowing when to stop and ask for clarification.

Now one thing that I always watch when a new product gets launched is how the team that built it

is talking about it. And while you might wonder how valuable that is because of course the team

that built it is going to chill it, right? I think you can actually get a lot of signal for how

a team talks about the thing that they built. And the team at Cursor and SpaceX AI for whom this

is one of their first major collaborative products are absolutely raving about this thing.

Peng Zheng writes, our relationship with AI is shifting from chatting back and forth to

entrusting a team of agents with real work. GROCKBOT is a glimpse of that future.

Sam Sokolin writes, this is one of the coolest projects I've worked on. GROCKBOT had insane

product market fit internally almost instantly. For much of the company bots have become the interface

for all of their work. Cursors Ricky Doer writes, GROCKBOT is not a new concept but its execution

is flawless. It's mind blowing what a good harness, cloud computing, massively advanced computer

use and state-of-the-art models are capable of. Every day I automate 20% more of my job so I can

discover the next frontier 20% focus on. First impressions in the community were similarly positive.

V-Shall Singh's brain exploded with all sorts of different use cases. Calling GROCKBOT actually

kind of ridiculous he says, it can open a computer by itself, log into your apps, use websites

like a human work while you sleep, clean your inbox and emails update your CRM. Research people

in companies, right, linked in an email drafts in your style, remember how you work, learn

a workflow after watching you once, run that workflow forever coordinate with other bots only

bother you when it needs a decision, and so much more that I'm yet to decipher. This is less

AI assistant and more, the intern who somehow became COO overnight. Pres. G writes, first impression

with GROCKBOT, I gave it a GitHub link and told it to read the code, not only to read me,

it pulled every file through the API and broke down the entire codebase. This thing is not just a

chatbot. Mike P writes, my first impression after chatting with the bot to understand how it works

is that this is currently the best mainstream interface for agent to AI that I've seen from any

leading company. He explains that it uses a virtual machine but can also access your local file

system. The magic he says in the key differentiator is that you don't actually have to toggle a bunch

of UI options or set anything up. writes, Mike, I think a lot of people open-clod co-work or code or

GBT work or codex and don't know WTF is going on and just bail because they don't feel like

figuring it out. I just installed GROCKBOT, hooked up my connectors and just started asking

it stuff and it just handled the rest. I was actually shocked when it jumped into a local folder

on my Mac just from me asking, there's no UI toggle or anything you need to do to point it where

you want it to go, you just tell it what to do and it asks for your permissions and handles everything

in the background. It also claims that when I use the iOS app, it reaches for my Mac as a primary

machine if I prompt it with something that requires using my Mac. So basically it's a remote

control but you don't have to go into a specific part of the UI like you did with dispatch, it just

does it. This he concludes is what it's going to take to get mass adoption. A Gentik AI wrapped up

in a product so easy to use that people will be able to just unwrap it and start cooking.

Now another notable thing in the early discourse to me is that a lot of times you hear people

raving about it without being specific about how they used it but I saw a ton of folks actually

talking about their use cases and what had impressed them in specific. Tesla's June 2 psi rights.

Grockbot was able to A go through the calendars and find anything I need to make reservations for

beforehand that I hadn't done yet, B determined the best time to make reservations and C navigate

the reservations on a website. While I was walking in the parking lot before getting to my cars,

I was talking to it and mixed Chinese in English. Color me impressed. Matt Schumer writes,

the little details are what makes Grockbot special. For example, I set up a researcher

bot on a writer bot, then made a chief of staff bot and asked it to get the other two working

together on a project. I checked in fully expecting that to fall apart because there was no way it

would work out of the box. It worked out of the box. Honestly he says this feels like it could be

the thing that gets millions of normal people using agents for the first time. And that was really

the gut sense for a lot of folks. That the promise we first saw in places like OpenClaw and Hermes

might finally be getting its moment to scale with something like Grockbot. A16z Martin Casado says,

This is the first product I've used that really nails the virtual coworker. I suspect we'll

view this launch as a pivotal moment in getting the abstraction for AI in the workplace right.

Heat and Shaw, who if you follow him, has been going deep on agent building ever since OpenClaw

came about, wrote, I spent months building agents the hard way. I gave them servers, memory,

skills, tools and loops. I put them in Slack and built recovery around them. One helped me ship

a product in six days. The same system also stalled, lost context and handed the unfinished edges back

to me. I became the infrastructure. That's why Grockbot hit me so hard. I've been testing it early.

It's bots coordinate with each other, work from a persisted computer and keep going across your

files and logged in apps while you're away. I recognize what the team built because I had

assembled so much of it by hand. Grockbot moves more of the invisible work around the agent into the

product. This is the missing work agent I've been waiting for. But no product can be perfect right

out of the box, right? So where are people's complaints? One small one is around the naming

conventions between cursor and SpaceX. Mike P. again writes, the cursor's SpaceX AI overlap is

giving Venmo PayPal vibes. Our cursor in Grock going to stay separate things. This is called Grockbot,

but I'm getting routed to a cursor login portal. I need to connect my Grock account to cursor to

launch a Grock product. What we do in here, fam? And indeed for some, Grock has too much baggage to

be excited about this new product. Ben Berry writes, I would have excitedly tried cursor bot but have

little to no interest in trying Grockbot. Way too much negative baggage for me to ever trust it with

access to anything. I'll wait for the inevitable offerings from a van a.i. and entropic.

Beyond that, some people just didn't have a great experience. Grobak's Shahal writes,

sorry guys, but Grockbot feels like a shiny object that looks incredible in demos but

simply isn't ready for prime time. The economics are broken. You burn through tokens just trying

to onboard it, then get pushed towards spending more just to keep going. That's not a sustainable

workflow. It feels like a broken slot machine. The bigger issue is memory. It forgets context,

loses track of tasks, and struggles to main continuity across longer projects.

An AI coding agent needs to remember the mission, not acting like it has amnesia every few hours.

Now I want to provide a full range of views, so I'm including this. However,

this is definitely not a common take that I saw. So contextualize it or give it whatever grain of

sand you want. Other complaints include this one from June, saying that while Grockbot has a

really clean UI, quote, it still heavily relies on integrations. No one wants to connect 20 plus

tools during onboarding. Plus, I'm not sure people want to create a specialized agent for every task.

Matt Schumer writes,

My only real complaint, which if they nail it will end up being a huge win, was the model router,

which wasn't great when I tested it. You don't choose a model for your Grockbot,

it's done automatically on the back end. Incredible for regular users when it's done well,

but frustrating for power users when done poorly. Schumer did add, I'm told they've made it

much better since I tested. Max Blade points out a functional issue of logging into your services

through Grockbot's virtual computer. He says the biggest issue right now is the data center IP

address creates bot blockages on everyday websites, which make things like ordering groceries from

Walmart problematic. Although he notes, quote, this will be solved by expanding their built-in

connectors and plugins to give official support everywhere. Maybe beyond that, there's just a broader

question of trust that is not unique to Grockbot, but becomes more poignant, the more powerful,

and the more deeply integrated into our work and personal lives these tools get. Peter Yang wrote,

the challenge with this and I'm sure upcoming products from the other major labs is,

one, how do you get regular users to trust sharing their credentials and logins with a remote

computer? Two, how do you reassure them that this remote computer is secure and truly theirs to

play with? And honestly, this one resonates with me. When I was playing around in testing Grockbot,

which spoiler alert I am incredibly impressed with and share a lot of the same excitement that you

heard from other folks in this episode, I did have this moment where I was about to log it into my

Spotify for creators account, which by the way was a relatively simple process of signing in via

its virtual computer interface, but then paused, thinking about just how devastating it would be if

something went wrong. By nature of the computer use paradigm, I wouldn't just be giving it access to,

for example, some analytics API. I would be letting it have access to my actual account to click

around and do things. Now, I certainly don't think that some Aaron command of mine would lead it

to go delete all past episodes of this show, but the fact that that's even possible gave me pause.

And like Peter noted, this is certainly not a problem for Grockbot alone, but it is a major barrier

to fully transitioning to new ways of working. Still, it's important not to overstate this.

For example, I had no problem giving it access to my email, because frankly, it's sending a bunch

of emails that it shouldn't or even deleting a bunch of emails would not be nearly as devastating

as anything having to do with the show. One very practical knock on the tool so far is that it is

only for extremely expensive accounts. You're either talking about a $300 a month Grock heavy

account that includes it or a $200 a month cursor ultra account, which doesn't have access to

the top Grock model. So at least for the moment, this is pretty well price gated. That said, I would

be very surprised if that was a permanent feature rather than an inference preservation mechanism,

first and foremost, at this stage. One interesting conversation, which is actually an episode that I was

thinking about doing later this week, is about whether the AI teammate metaphor is actually the

right mental model. I've been wondering and plan on exploring whether in fact, AI teammates are

for a variety of reasons, the wrong model and a better might be something like consultants.

But clearly, I'm not the only person thinking about this as type.com's Fletcher Richmond wrote,

we also thought a bunch of AI teammates was the right paradigm, but we've learned from customers

that having dozens of AI teammates is actually counterproductive. It's a vanity metric. Instead,

teams need a shared workspace where they can work with any model, build a company brain of skills,

integrations and context slash memory map to their permissions, build and host custom apps,

and interact from Slack email or wherever they work. Grockbot is pretty slick, but it's not how

people are going to work. Now, I'm not convinced that it's as binary as Fletcher is posting it, but I

would agree that I believe we're going to discover that there are two very different modes when it comes

to this sort of agentic support, the things that you use personally and the things that interact

with and integrate your team, and they might be pretty significantly different. Still, I expected over

the next couple of weeks, we are going to see a lot of exciting experiments that harken back to

those early, awesome days of open claw when people were spinning up entire teams. And to parko on

Twitter has built a core team that includes a chief of staff and engineering manager, five engineers,

a data analyst and a product manager, and shares how they interact and work together. Farzad has

given his team names, Webby is his web designer, Shotri is his short form content creator,

writing is his article slash newsletter writer, you get the idea. I fully intend to do a bunch

of experiments and come back and report to you on where I'm finding value, but for now, I agree with

Kettlebell Dan when he says the excitement around Grockbot has been off the charts today. I haven't

seen this kind of reception for a new product in a while. I for one I'm extremely excited to dig

deeper and will report back when I do. That however is going to do it for today's AIDLI brief.

Appreciate you listening or watching as always and until next time peace!