‘Verity’ Is Trash. But Is It Good Trash? Plus: ‘Digger’ Flopped and Warner Bros. Is No More.

2026-10-06 10:00:00 • 1:38:21

-

I'm Sean Fennese. I'm Amanda Dobbins. And this is the big picture a conversation show

0:20

about Varity and Endings. Today on the show we are talking about the new Colleen Hoover

0:24

adaptation Varity starring Anne Hathaway and Dakota Johnson. It was the biggest movie

0:28

of the weekend and is also a heaping pile of steamy pulpy trash. But is it good trash?

0:34

And what do we mean by that exactly? Amanda and I will explain. There was also a dramatic

0:38

change in studio leadership at the newly merged Warner Brothers Paramount over the weekend.

0:42

And we'll talk about that. As well as the failure of the movie Digger. It's all coming

0:46

up right after this.

0:47

Okay, Amanda. A lot happened over the weekend. I've been in New York, living a fabulous

0:54

life. You've been in Los Angeles living another life. I wish you well.

1:01

How was dinner with my husband? I did in fact have dinner with your husband in New York.

1:07

We were both away from our children and we were we were living it up. We went to an old

1:11

haunt of ours that we we dined in many times with me at a nice time. We are working here. Your

1:16

husband is working and I'm working. Maybe not as hard as you're working. You know who wasn't

1:20

working? It was the film Digger. The film Digger did not work for audiences around this great nation.

1:26

$7.9 million opening weekend. Is that was at the final tally? I didn't even update the final

1:31

numbers. But boy, this movie did not perform well on a budget north of $150 million. What do you

1:38

make that? Not surprised. The main reaction, the only thing that I was very sure about. Well,

1:44

I was sure of two things. One, I found the experience of watching the film irritating and two,

1:49

that it was not commercial. So that seemed to be a self-fulfilling prophecy of sorts that the movie

1:58

just really was so uncommercial that people gave up going to see it. And I do feel

2:04

this weekend anecdotally everyone I saw wanted to ask me about Digger and what I thought about it.

2:09

But none of them had seen it. And no one really had plans to see it. You know, we said on our Digger

2:16

episode, which I hope people will listen to you after seeing the film that we hoped they would

2:21

see the film. And before they listen to the podcast, no one did. Everyone was just like, no, no,

2:26

I'm not going to bother with this. Maybe I'll check it out on streaming. But this is so D-O-A

2:31

that I don't have to go. So I do think that the reviews and just the negative buzz and tracking

2:39

probably pressed it down even further. I think you're right. I think the word was out pretty

2:44

quickly that this was maybe not for everyone, but it still had a car crash quality. So I think

2:50

there was a curiosity about what it was that people were checking. So there's a lot of media

2:55

about the film. There are a lot of takes flying around about the film. I think you and I

2:59

anticipated correctly that there would also be a kind of counter-wave that there would be

3:04

some defense of the movie, maybe even a rising cult of this movie. And that's interesting.

3:11

I've been trying to sort it out. There's a couple of things I wanted to talk to you about

3:13

with respect to that. One of them is that many of Alejandro Inuretus compatriots publicly went

3:22

to bat for him. Alfonso Cuaron took to x.com, the everything app to share some thoughts about

3:30

other films historically that received negative reviews. And then we're ultimately praised as all

3:35

time classics, which you know what? I love my friends too. I understand. And as you know,

3:43

there are some things about Digger that I really quite liked. I came out and mixed positive on the

3:48

movie with some notes. The other thing is that the movie arrived at the exact moment when Pam

4:01

Abdi and Mike DeLuca were beheaded publicly by David Ellison. They're not joining the Warner

4:08

Brothers Paramount merger. They're not going to run the film slate and Warner Brothers anymore.

4:13

And I do want to have a long conversation with you about what their rain meant and what it means

4:18

for them to not be in that position. But there's one quick digger thing that I wanted to speak to you

4:22

about. And I don't want to spoil the movie for anybody who skipped the last episode. But there's

4:27

this kind of question of is the whole point of the movie to satirize satires. And I don't know that

4:32

we had a very specific conversation about that. But this is the week of the social reckoning. And

4:38

Aaron Sorkin has been identified as perhaps a target of the movie Digger. And I'm a little reluctant

4:45

to be like, that's the sum total of what the point of Digger is because that seems like the smallest

4:50

target imaginable. And I felt like it was a bit bigger than that. And I think a lot of what we see

4:55

in the cruise characters emotional complication makes it a bit wider and deeper. Do you think it's

5:04

as simple as like, this is just, this is a, you know, don't look up in the newsroom and shit like

5:09

that is just very stupid. And we should make fun of it because it doesn't change anything in the real

5:12

world. No, I think that's good posting, right? I think that's using all of the proper nouns available

5:17

to you and connecting the dots. And you got to have somewhere to go with the content. And also,

5:23

you can't use the movie itself because really no one has seen the movie. So bring in extra

5:30

memeable moments. See Aaron Sorkin's tan. I think that the movie is both bigger and smaller than

5:38

that. I think that it is operating on a very grand, um, non-specific. What does it mean to, um,

5:48

to make satire or make art? Um, and what can art do in the face of world, the world's great

5:54

complications? And I think it's also just very much about Inri too. So, and, and about the lone

6:01

filmmaker or, you know, the, the actor in this case Tom Cruise and there is a meta Tom Cruise

6:05

quality to it. But it feels very, very turned inward or on the grandest scale possible. Like,

6:14

I'm, I'm not sure that I would be surprised if Inri too crushed all four seasons of the

6:20

newsroom three. Uh, I think it was three. I did watch all three. Um, and, and enjoyed it.

6:27

And you don't have any Oscars. So no, no, you think I'll get to over under two Oscars for me

6:33

before I die. What do you think? I think under because you are historically against people having

6:40

two Oscars. So if you got the first one, then you would sabotage the second you'd try to

6:46

spread the wealth. You know, that's the kind of you are. Wow. Yeah. Thank you for reading me that

6:51

way. Uh, I agree with you about Digger and I, you know, I suspect we'll talk about it a little

6:54

bit more because people are going to start checking it out and it's going to be on VOD probably in

6:57

about two weeks here. So once that happens, we'll be able to, but which D, like which, I guess,

7:04

it'll be paid for. Yeah. Which, uh, where, where will it be available? I, you know, you'll pay for

7:13

it. But once it's free on streaming, which is where most people will watch the first 20 minutes,

7:17

will they even make it to the twist? Is a big question. Oh, when will they check out? That's a

7:23

fascinating. Yes. That's a fascinating note. I mean, presumably it goes to HBO Max by January.

7:29

Okay. And that'll exist as HBO Max. I think so. When those two things will fuse as an

7:34

elegant transition into our broader conversation about Warner Brothers and Paramount and everything

7:40

that happened over the weekend, um, I do think that Digger is the last of its kind for now. Mm-hmm.

7:48

The $150 million, a tourist solipsistic fantasy with a massive movie star is the most emblematic

7:56

possible movie of the Mike and Pam era for good and for ill. And when you look at the movie that

8:03

triumphed over it in Verity, which did very well this weekend and is kind of is is is IP. It is

8:10

the opposite of the O'Tourg driven movie that is original in theory. Um, it's a pretty stark

8:18

comp to to where we're all headed here. Um, I'm not sure that Digger should have been number one.

8:25

Like I mean, it's not really qualitative judgment. I think it's just indicative of

8:31

if you don't have the goods. See sinners or weapons. This business is really, really hard

8:39

when trying to do those things. And what one thing that I thought was quite cool about the Abdean

8:45

Deluca era was that they somehow convinced David's as love that this was the way. And they had it.

8:52

I think about as many wins as they did losses in this regime, which started in 2022, but probably

8:58

really properly starts like end of 23, 24 because that's when they're the films that they chose

9:04

started to hit the board. I mean, you can talk about that each one kind of individually briefly. But

9:07

I don't know. What do you make of this news that they're not coming and that this period,

9:12

this very brief post COVID period that from a major studio that was throwing all this stuff

9:17

against the wall has ended and is now leading into Skydance. It's pretty grim. I'm feeling quite sad

9:26

about it. And I and and hopeless. I think we've traded places. And maybe that's because we've literally

9:32

traded places. And you've been in New York, uh, Galavanting around, um, and seeing the future of cinema.

9:38

Yeah, let's look at those jazz hands. And I learned the Mike and Pam news, like, I think everyone

9:48

possibly including Mike Deluca from Matt Bellany's newsletter on Thursday night. And I read that

9:54

newsletter 20 minutes before I walked into a party for a Netflix film. And the mood was quite

10:02

interesting. And and the the vibe, it's not like I spoke to anyone. I didn't do any reporting. I

10:10

just had a glass of wine and left. But the vibe of being at a at a party for a film that will go

10:18

straight to streaming that we'll talk about that is not it's, you know, it's not one battle after

10:26

another. It's not digger. It's just another movie. And these people have just had their, uh, these

10:32

people who at least were trying to make original projects and put them in theaters have been fired.

10:38

David Ellison is coming to bring, you know, all of his aviation movies to the masses. And everyone

10:47

lots of people are going to get fired. And the the history of cinema of in Paramount and Warner

10:55

Brothers, which have existed for decades and are part of Old Hollywood are now being, you know,

11:02

re-arrased with Larry Ellison's money. It was just kind of grim. It was like, oh, so this is the

11:08

future, huh? This seems this is exciting. Not. It's it's pretty grim. Yeah. Yeah. I mean, in addition to

11:16

the news about Abdean Deluca, the news that, you know, on crides, the former Mattel CEO would be

11:22

coming in as the new, the CEO of Skydance. And that he is an experienced business executive who

11:28

will probably be responsible for executing the redundancies and reducing a lot of the synergies

11:35

between the two companies and all that business stuff. And also that, you know, that was something

11:39

that he didn't motel. And he also was responsible for helping to shepherd the IP maturation of Barbie

11:46

and less successfully masters of the universe and he man. And the matchbox film that's coming to

11:51

Apple this month. And so yeah, Paramount and Josh Greenstein and Dana Goldberg, they will run the

12:02

film division there and they have been at Paramount for about a year. And look, they're, they're pretty

12:07

seasoned executives. Greenstein has mostly worked in movie marketing. He's been at a number of studios

12:12

over the years, including he was in Paramount in the 2010s and he came back. Dana Goldberg has worked

12:17

for David Ellison at Skydance for 15 or 16 years. Look at the movies that Skydance made.

12:22

They made some cool stuff, right? They may top gun Maverick. Top gun Maverick. Big fan of that movie.

12:26

They are their first film was true grit. Love that movie. They also made some other stuff.

12:31

And that stuff isn't great. Last night I was looking at, can we just read the slate of Paramount

12:39

for the rest of 2026? Yeah. You do that and then I'll do the upside, okay?

12:46

Whereas yes. Okay. What makes you think this isn't an upside? Okay, we'll fire away. Okay, so

12:53

upcoming. You're your most anticipated film of October Street Fighter, October 16th. I am pumped.

13:00

I must say I'm pumped. And that's good. Listen, we all have our enthusiasm. Mine is top gun Maverick.

13:07

November 13th, Ebenezer, starring Johnny Depp. November 25th, Focker and Law, which is a co-productive

13:16

production with Universal Pictures. I guess this is international distribution for Paramount. Okay,

13:20

so here we go. Angry Birds Movie 3, December 23rd. Yeah, what do you think of Angry Birds Movie 2?

13:29

Have you ever played any Angry Birds? Yes. You have? Yes. That's cool. Okay, were you really into

13:37

phone games? Was I really into phone games? No, I wasn't really into phone games, right?

13:43

I've played phone games. Okay, I played some candy crush, but that's kind of it. Yeah, brick breaker.

13:49

Nope. You never played brick breaker on your on your on your blackberry? No. Do you have a blackberry?

13:56

Yes, but I didn't play any games with it. I just did the what was the messaging called?

14:03

The messaging? Yes. I don't know. I guess it wasn't called texting. I know it wasn't. It was

14:08

something different. Anyway, Mr. A Relevant. Yeah, I'm looking forward to that. I saw the trailer for

14:15

that ahead of Verity. And I was like, yeah, down the middle, sentimental sports drama, yes. Yes,

14:21

but so Street Fighter, Ebenezer, Angry Birds Movie 3, and Mr. A Relevant. Right. So I think based

14:28

on that, I don't think that's the worst slate of all time. No. And honestly, Paramount has had a

14:33

pretty mid last three or four years in general with the studio because they've been in this kind of

14:38

transitory moment. I think that you can also look at all the people that they've signed up

14:45

to make stuff in the last six to 12 months as also indicative of what they're interested in. Now,

14:50

I do think that there is a little bit of like a Americana that feels meaningful to them. Sure.

14:56

Like that there's going to be they're making a call of duty movie with Peter Berg,

15:00

which I think is a very smart IP adaptation. And Peter Berg is very good at war movies. But that

15:05

does speak to a different kind of audience. I think then with some of what Pam and Mike were doing.

15:09

But you know, they also signed the Duffer Brothers away from Netflix, the creators of Stranger Things,

15:13

who I'm interested to see what kinds of movies they'll make. They signed John M. Choo to a

15:19

multi-picture deal. I'm kind of a coin flip on John Choo movies. You know, really neither of us

15:23

really cared for wicked at all. But like I like Crazy Rich Asians. These made some movies I like.

15:27

I wish it. But Crazy Rich Asians just should be so much better. And that's one where I wish that they

15:34

would just like redo it. And they can even give John M. Choo another chance. But I'm just like,

15:40

it's one of those where it's just not good enough. Yeah. I think he's like a steady Hollywood hand.

15:45

Not like that. That's not like an embarrass. There's no code there for what it means that they

15:48

hire John Choo. And then there's more people. There's, you know, the the first thing that Goldberg and

15:53

Greenstein did was they signed James Mangold and Timothy Shalamay to make a crime movie.

15:59

Which I'm, I mean, I'm great with that. Yes. I love that conceptually. They extended Dan

16:05

Tractenberg who's been making the President Predator films for Fox to a new deal. Parker Finn,

16:11

who made the smile movies, which I'm a little bit more mixed on. But now he's making a remake of

16:14

possession, which I don't think isn't necessarily the greatest idea in the world. But it's at least,

16:18

um, it's, it's aggressive. It's, it's, there's something fresh about that. Um, and then Will Smith

16:26

has a new deal with the studio as well, which is complicated. As, and Damien Chazal's The Prison

16:32

Movie is also his prison movies, theoretically coming out next year. Yeah.

16:36

So killing Murphy and Daniel Craig. So I, I think there are some re, like, optimistic notes.

16:43

Tiana Taylor's directorial debut comes out next year. Um, there'll be some other stuff.

16:50

I don't know if it's going to be amazing. But if you look back at Mike and Pam,

16:57

and even the, the eras before that, right? You had a pretty successful stretch for the Warner

17:04

Brothers film studio in the 2000s, because it's also the same time as Harry Potter and the rise

17:10

of the Nolan Batman films. And of course, all the Nolan movies all the way up until

17:14

after the tenant fiasco. And you know, we also have had the dude movies have been coming out over

17:20

this time, which are like, I don't know, I'm not sure that Abdean to look in a certain credit for

17:23

that. But then when you had all that IP in place, and then you stacked it on top of these movies,

17:31

it was pretty exciting. So like, let's go through the list. What do you think? I put together the

17:35

wins here. Yeah. And they're almost in order to me. But they're ranked. Yeah. Yeah. I mean,

17:42

sinners was the first film that came to mind because sinners was a movie where like they made a

17:46

really tough deal on sinners where they had to give the copyright back to the filmmaker. And that

17:50

was widely criticized. And it turned out to be a really smart move because sinners was such a huge

17:54

hit and also an awesome awards film. And I think goes down is like a very memorable movie from the,

18:02

if not this decade, maybe the century that people have a big relationship to. So if you make just one

18:07

of those, that's pretty good. Will you be making sinners a Paramount? I'm not sure.

18:12

I mean, and they certainly won't be making that deal in order to land the film both from a business

18:18

perspective. And also the Ryan Cougars carve out or special contract, whatever you want to call it,

18:24

was in part because of the text of the film and what the film was about. And it just does not

18:31

really seem so far like this Skydance ownership is going to be sensitive to those kinds of

18:40

themes and requests. But I guess we don't know. Maybe that's not fair to say. Yeah. But also,

18:46

so you have in here sinners, weapons, and then one battle after another winning best picture,

18:51

all grouped in row. But those were all in the same year. They were. Yeah. So that's a pretty good job.

18:58

It's a really good job, though. I do have a question for you when we get through the wins and

19:01

losses of that. Yeah. I want to talk about it too, which is just kind of they stacked one amazing

19:07

year that they hosted on for 18 months. And that was clearly a strategy of sorts. Though I do

19:16

start to wonder how much of a strategy it is because all of these movies are big productions and

19:21

with lots of people and you're working far in advance. And I think you have some say of one

19:30

things are ready and when things are going to be rolled out. And but I don't do we think that

19:36

they were there long enough and had enough foresight and could arrange things enough that they

19:43

were like, okay, we'll just do 2025 and stack all of our good movies at once so that then

19:49

hopefully the sale goes through and we're in a in a good place. I mean, I think they and other people

19:55

at the company knew which movies, not so much which movies to release. Because you know, when you're

19:59

in that environment like these films are tested, we they have an expectation of what audiences are

20:04

going to do. There's a long range tracking for certain movies and certain that have certain

20:07

particular audiences. It's really more about what movies to hold. And what they did is they held

20:14

six absolute stinkers till 2026 to make the film studio seem as attractive as possible

20:21

in the negotiation phase. So that choice to me made the 2025 gambit look really good. I mean,

20:27

in addition to those three movies that we talked about and look, one battle after another is not

20:31

like a massive financial success, but it is also basically a forever movie annuity having one

20:36

best picture. So you put those three together. Those are big wins plus you got also on this podcast,

20:41

we do care about like the quality of films. And like and doing the right thing and investing in art,

20:48

which is also when you were talking about how Mike and Pam were criticized for the Ryan Kugler deal,

20:53

criticized by who biggers. We're not biggers, right? So like we good job on that one.

20:58

I know the problem is that like you're right, but they're executives, they're not

21:02

creators. Totally. And we are having a conversation about their business decisions that led to a

21:07

business decision of them no longer having a job. I get it, but I do also want us to remember that

21:13

one battle after another was our favorite film of last year. And we like it when movies are good.

21:19

Totally. There are many episodes in which you hear me saying that very thing.

21:24

I'm trying to hold on to our humanity. If no one else can, we are we're holding on to it.

21:29

No, I've lost it. Mine's gone. It's over. It's over. I'm just a banker now.

21:34

Doon kept the train on the tracks with Doon. Doon is obviously a legendary production,

21:38

not I don't mean that in the magic title sense. I mean literally the company legendary.

21:44

Getting a Minecraft movie out in the world the way that they did. I think Toby Emmerich's

21:48

regime hired the director and got that movie started, but they marketed it well. They released

21:53

it well and now it's a mega hit and they're putting out another one next year. And they signed

21:56

Pearson Dutz for number two. Huge for you. Huge for all of us. Distributed F1. They didn't pay

22:02

for it, but they put it out in the world. They made that movie a hit. Superman. I think Superman's a win.

22:07

I think especially in the slow decay of new superhero content, they did pretty good

22:16

business with that. It probably could have been bigger, but what definitely wasn't bad.

22:18

Weathering Heights did pretty good business as well. And that was another deal that they signed

22:22

where they really went aggressively after that movie and they wanted over Netflix by giving it

22:25

theatrical. And even though you and I were not really crazy about weathering Heights,

22:30

I like that. I like the idea of Emerald Finale getting that deal like that and putting a movie

22:35

as big as that movie is out in the world. It's cool. It's doing cool things instead of Ebenezer.

22:42

Yes. Beetlejuice too. You didn't really like that one.

22:45

It was okay. It felt a little reheated. I mean, it gave us one of the great jokes of this podcast,

22:51

which was you texting us from Las Vegas in like 2020 being like, hey,

22:56

word on the street. Beetlejuice too. The new system came.

23:01

No, that is now what I said. It was going to be huge is what I said, which is what happened.

23:08

New line, the train was on the tracks, conjuring. Yeah.

23:12

Five came out and crushed and conjuring four. And final destination six was a banger and all

23:19

those movies seem to be doing just fine. And you know, they marketed Wonka straight to success.

23:25

How did your body feel as you were saying that out loud?

23:28

Well, at least I said it. I told the truth on this podcast.

23:32

Okay, here are some misses. Okay. I mean, they almost got fired twice. Yeah.

23:37

And then they did get fired. So they get fired. That's not an ideal.

23:41

It's funny how they would show up in Las Vegas every year to present their slate.

23:49

And their presence was one year they were definitely about to get fired except then they just

23:56

presented like a historic run of movies. So they were fine. And then the next year,

24:01

they just tried to do a victory lap, but they were about to get fired again. And they were also

24:06

like here are all of the movies that we know that no one's going to go see, which as well.

24:12

Yeah, they've been through it. I hope they don't read the comments.

24:16

Yeah. I mean, they've both had really big and great careers in many ways, but they have just

24:20

become so emblematic of this kind of sinophilia versus the encroaching tech monster eating Hollywood

24:28

war. So that's sort of why we're memorializing their era in this way. Yeah. I mean, Joker Folia do.

24:35

Yeah, I did work out. It didn't. And honestly, I think it changed movies in a huge way because it

24:40

now means that no Hollywood movies go to film festivals anymore. Really true. So thanks for that.

24:45

That was interesting. Yeah. Digger obviously is a massive L. The movie's going to lose $200

24:49

million to the studio. That's not good. That's not good Amanda. It's it's not good. You don't

24:54

want to know. It's not your money. It's not my money. The bride. Yeah. Again, another movie that like

25:01

I kind of liked whispers. I kind of liked it. That's good. That was another very irritating movie to

25:07

watch. Yeah. And I guess in some ways, it's really matched with both Digger and the next film,

25:13

which is Mickey 17, which you compared it to when we discussed the digger last week. And those

25:18

three movies are the downside. I think specifically of the weapons sinners, one battle after another

25:25

trilogy of power. They are, oh, Tor driven, flops. There's no other way around it.

25:33

Mickey 17 did okay business. It did like across like a hundred million worldwide. It made a lot

25:37

more money than Digger's going to make. That's for sure. But yeah, those three movies are not total

25:41

successes. The end of Oak Street is a weird one where like it was kind of on the shelf for a while,

25:44

got recut. I ended up liking it. Did you end up seeing it? No, I still didn't see it because it

25:49

got dumped in August. And it's available on streaming. I just, you know, I think about it every night.

25:55

And then I have to watch something else for the show, which is I guess how many people are

25:59

experiencing it. Yeah, maybe when it hits like HBO Max, we should, we should chat about it a little

26:04

bit. It's some curious what your thoughts are on. I liked it. But it didn't totally hit the way

26:08

they were hoping. Another thing that has been happening, which is so interesting, we've only talked

26:12

about maybe once so far as, you know, they were not able to lobby to keep coyote versus acne. We

26:16

don't know what their role was in terms of the David's as love decision to to punt that movie off the

26:22

slate entirely and eventually sell it to catch up entertainment. But coyote versus acne over the

26:26

weekend, crossed a hundred million dollars worldwide in the box office. That's pretty good.

26:31

You know, congratulations to catch up media. Yes, very exciting for them. They bet wisely.

26:37

And people seem to like that movie. I think most of the people who like that movie are 37 and not

26:42

right nine. That was our experience. Yeah. But they like it. And that's certainly something. And then

26:46

of course, the back girl fiasco, which is not it's not Abdi and Deluca's fault. But

26:52

that to just the lead a movie is is abhorrent. I mean, that's just horrible. Well, the the back girl

26:58

of it all leads into the next issue, which is DC more broadly. And you put Superman in the wind column,

27:05

but everything else is Ben pretty bleak. And super girl is still the worst movie of the year for me

27:13

personally. And it's down there for me too. And they're just just does not seem like there's a lot

27:20

of juice. It with anything that James Gunn has going on. And I know that I'm not supposed to count

27:26

him out because you all liked those movies with the raccoon. And that's very beautiful. Guardians

27:33

of the galaxy. Crank films. Yeah, I think Manitomara will be back. I think because I think he's going

27:39

to I think he's going to pour a lot of the DC universe into that movie. And it's going to feel more

27:43

and Avengers DC movie where a lot of figures that we know about. And so they're going to it's going

27:48

to draw us in. I mean, I like Superman. So I'm curious to see what he does. But in general, I do

27:52

think the future of DC is a little dodgy. And it seems like while James Gunn and Peter Safran are

27:56

coming over in the transition to Paramount, it's a little bit of a like wait and see period here

28:02

in terms of what the rest of their slate looks like. Because after Clayface and Manitomara,

28:07

I'm not sure if there's another film that's officially been greenlit yet. Okay, since we're talking

28:11

about the future of DC Studios, too, we should also mention the Batman part two, which is

28:15

technically not under the James Gunn and Peter Safran leadership. But as a movie that is hugely

28:20

anticipated, we had heard that Robert Pattinson had returned to London to start shooting that movie.

28:26

This is the sequel to Matt Reeves's original film, which came out a few years ago. And then there's

28:31

been some news this morning that Matt Reeves is stepping away from this movie for personal reasons.

28:36

And there had been some rumblings about that going on. And so this movie that was originally planned

28:41

for February of 2028, and now may be a little bit longer. I'm not sure if there's much for us to

28:46

necessarily discuss here, but it is another film that is a piece of the puzzle in this merger.

28:51

Horizon? Yeah. I mean, release the tapes.

28:56

Yeah. I mean, that was only distribution for that first movie, but the second movie is now,

29:01

is it never going to come out? Kevin Costner's Western trilogy,

29:05

Courthology, whatever. It's going to be supposed to end up becoming.

29:09

I have no idea. I know two people who have seen it. Yeah. Zach Barron and Griffin Newman.

29:13

Yeah. Two best. And you didn't go. Two goats. I fucked up. I should have gone to the Santa

29:18

Barber Film Festival and gone to see Horizon Part Two. And then I didn't. And then there was some

29:22

negative press around the film. And then I don't know. Just now it's gone. Sad.

29:27

Very, very weird. Were they part of the decision making process that allowed the original plan

29:35

of Horizon One premiering, I believe in June. And Horizon Two being slated six weeks later.

29:44

I don't know. Because that's not what you want. That decision belongs in the El Colum,

29:50

for whoever, whoever it was. You're right. And thank you for reminding me of that. And the removal

29:55

of it given its performance is ridiculous. Yeah. And yet like, I honestly feel like they could have

30:01

just dropped two on streaming and done good business. Because I mean, that film with its

30:07

multi story narrative, like it kind of feels like a TV show. It feels more like a TV show than it

30:11

does a film. And it's got like five different storylines. And you know, it's like cutting back and

30:17

forth between the A plot and the C plot and the D plot, you know, who's to say they still can't?

30:21

I guess I could. Horizon Two is owned by Warner Brothers today. And no, it's not Kevin

30:29

Costner. It's still owned by the investors. Yes. They're only distributing the movie. That's right.

30:35

Okay. This is a mega-lopeless situation. Oh, I forgot about that. That's right. Because he

30:40

put, he sold the ranch or whatever, or the, you know, the carpenteria beach. That's right. Yeah.

30:45

So he's a little to me. Okay. You love the beach. So congratulations. He did not sell it to me.

30:52

Practical magic too. I put on here, even though it like whatever, it's financial fortunes

30:56

didn't really matter to anything. I just thought it sucked. So I'll put it on here as a loss.

31:00

It wasn't very good. Big swing still to come. That's the other thing that is really

31:04

fascinating about this next 12 months is there's all these Pam and Mike movies that they greenlit

31:10

that are just coming out. And some of them are like, man, of tomorrow, right? Or it's like,

31:14

that's a big IP summer movie. And, you know, anybody would have made that movie essentially. Like

31:18

James Gunn and Peter Safram were the ones who pushed that forward. But the first one to come is

31:21

Remain, which in February comes out the new M night Shyamalan movie, which actually screened

31:26

Beyond Fest last week. And I'm kicking myself that I was not there. They did a screening

31:31

at the director's Village Theater of the sixth sense. Did you see this? No.

31:36

They did the screening of the sixth sense of director's Village Theater. There are a series

31:38

of Shyamalan films were shown to be on Fest here in LA. And then he came out after the film. And he

31:43

said, guys, if I was really cool, I would just like show you Remain right now. But it's not finished

31:49

I'm really sorry. You know what? Fuck it. I'm just going to show it to you. And then they just ran

31:53

the movie four months before it's coming out. And it got a very positive response. Now it got a

31:57

positive response from people sickos who went to go see the sixth sense on like a Wednesday night.

32:01

Right. And then we're also able to stay in their seats for another two hour movie unplanned,

32:07

which is the target audience for that. It's very savvy. It was smart. Yeah. They generate some nice

32:12

buzz for the movie. But you you can't kick yourself for that because how could you have known to go

32:18

see not to be too much of a freak, but I just had a feeling that was going to happen. I

32:22

I swear to God. I swear to God. And I thought about that with like my travel dates and stuff.

32:26

Anyway, I blew it. Number two is the most important movie of the year for you in 2027. It's Paris

32:32

Paramount. Yeah. Could not have a more amazing title. Although it may be renamed apparently

32:40

according to Nancy Meyers' Instagram because a crew member got a Paris Paramount tattoo

32:46

that she Instagrammed. And then she noted that she told him it might change anyway.

32:52

That that's kind of what we know about Paris Paramount and the nutshell. That story says it all.

33:00

Anyway, this is the much delayed Nancy Meyers written and directed film that was at Netflix with

33:07

Scarlett Johansson. And now it is at Warner Brothers soon to be Sky Dance, not with Scarlett Johansson.

33:15

And a lot of a lot of information coming about this movie right now. You know, I'm protecting my heart.

33:24

We'll wait and see. It's slated for Christmas 2020. I think it has been quite expensive. It's certainly

33:29

been shooting for a very long time. And I've seen them building a lot of sets on Nancy's Instagram.

33:35

I don't know. That's a big risk. I may not really matter long term because it's happening and it's

33:42

coming out no matter what. So Paramount's going to have to market it. And we've got JJ Ayrms'

33:45

The Great Beyond, which was delayed one year from November to next October. We've got our friend

33:49

Sam Esmail's new movie, starting Julia Roberts Panic carefully, which I'm really looking forward to.

33:53

It's coming in the spring. We've got Zach Kregger's The Flood, of course, his follow-up to

33:58

Resident Evil, which is an original sci-fi extravagance of what you talked about when he was on the show.

34:02

And I suspect we'll probably work just given what Kregger's been up to over the last few years.

34:07

And Jennifer Lawrence is going to start on it, right? She is indeed going to start on that.

34:10

There you go. I'm excited about that. And then Gladys, which is the spin-off of weapons.

34:16

And I wonder if that will still happen because maybe Paramount may want to re-look at the

34:23

Weapons IP and do something that they want to do rather than what was pushed forward,

34:27

since this is a very valuable property. I don't know what stage Gladys is in right now,

34:31

but Kregger's not directing that movie. So if I were Paramount, I'd be looking very closely

34:37

at the way they're executing on every single bit of valuable film coming along. There's a

34:42

couple of other examples of that. Like, Gremlins 3 is coming out, I think in 2028, directed by Chris

34:47

Columbus. Yes, indeed, that Chris Columbus. Not the other Chris Columbus. So the famed explorer

34:53

who's been dead for 600 years is directing the film, which is really exciting. And yeah, Gremlins,

34:59

what you've seen Gremlins? I don't think so. I think that I've seen, you know, I know what the

35:04

Gremlins are. I guess they don't know their mythology. It is a bit of a what is her legend situation,

35:12

but I do know what they look like. It's time. It's time. It's this Christmas. It's a Christmas film.

35:18

It's time. Do you think my children will like it or is it just for me?

35:21

Too scary. Too scary. Oh, too scary. Seven. Maybe for Gremlins? I would say.

35:28

Gremlins rocks. Gremlins two all-time classic. One of the greatest films ever made.

35:33

Simply put, Gremlins two colon the new batch. An extraordinary satire.

35:39

So it does things Digger could never even dream of. Okay, I believe you, because Digger dreamed of

35:44

a lot of things, but did very few of them. That's right. What's what's what's Pam and Mike's legacy?

35:52

I mean, it feels like the end of an era of Hollywood. And I don't know whether it's the end of

35:57

the first hundred years of Hollywood or just the end of this very weird time in Hollywood,

36:04

where as you said, big tech companies are coming in and disrupting used intentionally

36:15

as the way that films are made and distributed. And so director names, movie stars, theatrical

36:25

releases, big original swings don't make sense anymore. And they were the last people doing it.

36:31

And now it's done. And we all march into the ocean together with Skydance and its airplane movies.

36:41

I hope not. I hope that. I hope that. I hope that. I mean, you've seen a lot of things in New York

36:46

this week. There is there are many other things happening in film culture that are exciting. But

36:51

they were old school studio heads doing a thing, trying in a lot of ways to recreate what we loved

36:59

about the 90s. And every once in a while succeeding. And also coming up against the market realities

37:08

of the last five years. And now it's done. Yeah, we're I'm going to keep a close watch on whether or not

37:16

they pop up again, because it's not out of the realm of possibility to me that they could appear

37:20

at Sony if Tom Rothman retires, you know, I think he's in his early 70s at this point.

37:26

Or if Apple continues to build their film department, that's somewhere that they could go. However,

37:31

like even this conversation that we're having here, which is again, an extended conversation

37:34

about executives on a movie celebration podcast. I think it speaks to a little bit of the morning

37:40

and a little bit of my are are shared concerned that their particular skill set is just less meaningful

37:47

to the future of the business. And then that impacts the kinds of movies we get to talk about

37:51

on the show. But you're right. And I have been seeing some good stuff in New York. And I will we can

37:54

talk about that because you've seen a couple of the things as well at this point that are here at

37:57

the festival. So on Fridays episode, we'll get into some of the cool stuff that we can preview that

38:02

we've liked or not liked out of the festival. Okay. I mean, before we dive into Verity, we do have

38:07

some breaking news here this morning, which is that. So, Cario 3 is happening. I don't know if Jack

38:15

can pipe in a CR screaming. So, Cario right. Yeah.

38:18

Of his lungs. Newse alert. But it's not only happening Emily Blunt, Benicio Del Toro and Josh

38:24

Brolin are returning. Did you have you seen So, Cario Day of the Soldado, the second So, Cario film?

38:29

I haven't. I've consumed much content of Chris Ryan talking about it. Yeah, sure.

38:35

And I almost feel like I should have like a one of those like CR, you know, cut out mass that I

38:40

could just put over my face right here. And then I could just pretend to be CR. I'm very happy for him.

38:46

Didn't even a new is not directing this. So. Yeah. No, Nora Stefano Solima who directed the second film.

38:53

And I'm not seeing Taylor Sheridan's name here in the news either. In fact, Patrick McKinley who

39:00

directed the wait, the film we talked about a couple of couple episodes ago. The Ethan Hawke

39:05

survival thriller is the new director. And Steve and Knight, a very well-known writer behind

39:11

P blinders among other things is writing the screenplay. And I guess I hadn't realized that

39:15

Socario was one of those properties that is not actually properly attached to a studio. And that

39:19

it's sound the lines gate release the first two movies, not clear who's going to be releasing this

39:24

movie. They're going to take it to market. I'm sure Taylor Sheridan stands to profit from this in

39:28

some way since he created it. But. And that's always what we worry about. Well, I think he's doing

39:33

pretty well. I mean, you heard he bought a ranch. It's crazy. Emily Blunt returning.

39:39

I I want nice things for her. She was not into just a. All right, did not make an appearance to one of

39:47

the most depraved. Darkly violent films. Yeah, yeah, yeah, that was the the top line report. And so

39:54

I just thought I would leave it to Chris. You know, I've been listening to a lot of Gwen Stefani in

40:00

the past few weeks. What Stefani in honor of Emily Blunt and her performance in disclosure day,

40:06

which yeah, been overlooked and under appreciated. So whatever she wants to do, you know, that isn't

40:13

being Mary Poppins again. Yeah. Okay, I'm going to keep my eye on this one. I think we all will.

40:19

Feels bit like cash crab to me. I'm not sure there's another chapter in this story, but you know what?

40:26

I await CR's thoughts. That's what I'll say. Okay, let's transition now to our conversation about

40:32

Verity, which we'll do right after this. This episode is brought to you by State Farm. There's

40:39

nothing better than having friends who support whatever you're into like rewatching a director's

40:44

entire catalog and the lead up to their latest release. And like those friends, State Farm is

40:48

there to help you feel supported by helping you choose the coverage you need with so many coverage

40:52

options. It's nice knowing you have help finding what fits for you. So you can check coverage off

40:57

the list and spend more time debating movie rankings. Go online at state farm.com or use the

41:01

easily accessible app to get help from one of their local agents, like a good neighbor. State Farm

41:06

is there. Okay, Verity. This is the new feature film directed by Michael Showalter. It's written by

41:13

Nick Antoska. It's an adaptation of Colleen Hoover's bestselling novel of the same name. It stars

41:18

Anne Hathaway, Dakota Johnson and Josh Hartnett. Yes. Set the scene for us. Set the scene for us.

41:24

Where were you? The screen or the story? You're screening. I saw it at the AMC Lincoln Square,

41:30

one of the greatest movie theaters in America. I saw it in the Dolby room there. Sold out crowd at

41:36

noon on a Saturday. Okay. And yeah, there was a buzz in the air. We're about to witness cinema.

41:48

You went alone. I went alone. Yeah, no, I wasn't casting around to see if anybody would join me.

41:53

That's been their Saturday afternoon with me. I mean, it's something even on a trip to New York

41:57

where I'm seeing the great works of cinema and an international film festival. Honestly,

42:01

candidly meeting many cool people, some very famous people. I'm having a very fun weekend.

42:07

I did go see Verity at an AMC. I guess it's a lone on a Saturday. This is the life that we chose.

42:15

A lone at a new non-a Saturday. That's freedom to a parent of a young child.

42:20

You're absolutely right. And in that way, I really appreciated it. How did you see it? It's that

42:26

you're seen. I went with Yassie Salock to one of the Wednesday night special frit like fans'

42:32

preview screenings. Oh, wow. At the, well, I mean, just that you could buy tickets for. Did you have

42:37

like a watermelon apple teeny or anything? No, I did have a glass of Kim Crawford, obviously.

42:42

And Yassie tried to bring her cheesecake factory meal into the theater and was stopped. So that set sort

42:50

of a a tough tone for the night. That absolutely breaks my rule, Amanda. We do not bring meals into

42:57

screenings. That's just not okay. Yassie, I love Yassie, but Yassie, please come on. It wasn't me,

43:03

first of all. I had a meal at home alone with my child because it was, I went on my second child's

43:09

second birthday to see Verity alone. I was like, good night. Happy birthday. And then you

43:16

make it sound like you left him at like 3 p.m. I did. I did sort of. I was like, we really,

43:24

we got to wrap this up because the tickets, they're, they're for seven 20 buds. So I need you to go

43:30

to sleep. It was also the night before his first day of school. So I was like, yeah, yeah,

43:34

school. I love you. Bye. Through him and the crib, drove straight to the American and we had the

43:39

whole cheesecake factory altercation. And then I got a large glass of Kim Crawford. And we were,

43:46

I don't know if we were in the Dolby room or like the prime room, but so I also saw it in AMC

43:50

without my children. And it was pretty packed. And this wasn't like a gatekeeping screening. It was

43:59

open to the public. You just could if you were very excited about the release of Verity,

44:05

go early. And it seems that people did increasingly common now to get the two days early screening,

44:11

especially at the major theater chains for movies like this. For anybody who's not aware of it,

44:15

I'll give them the description of what happens in the movie, higher to be a ghost writer for

44:19

renowned author Verity Crawford. Lowen Ashley's assignment takes a dark turn when she discovers

44:24

chilling autobiographical notes. As she rustles with disturbing and twisted confessions about

44:29

Verity's husband, she soon finds it hard to separate fiction from reality, manipulation from attraction,

44:35

and opportunity from obsession. What did you think of the film Verity?

44:42

I've been writing for this, right? Not having read the book and not having seen it. I think I drafted

44:47

it and most anticipated whatever. I thought there was possibility for this to be my kind of fun

44:56

at the movies. And I did have fun, primarily because I was sitting next to Yassi and I had a large

45:04

glass of Kim Crawford. And yeah, I was in the mood to have fun, but I was quite disappointed.

45:10

I was really this, this was not the level of trash that I wanted.

45:18

No, it's not good. It's not good for Verity of reasons. I think this is an interesting cast,

45:24

and we can have a long emotional conversation about the unemotionality of Dakota Johnson at some

45:30

point here. But I think given some of the folks who were involved, and the sense that the movie

45:39

does seem to have some relationship to its own idea of camp, its own idea of trashiness.

45:46

And then it sort of finds itself in having its cake and eating it to scenario where there are times

45:54

when Anne Hathaway's performance in particular is so outsized and mannered and specific and

45:59

kind of referencing things that make us think of another time. And Josh Hartnett similarly,

46:05

I think is in sort of like the Richard Geer role in this film, you know, playing a very specific

46:09

kind of man who like maybe cuckled it, but may also be in charge and maybe deviant or maybe isn't.

46:16

And Dakota Johnson is somewhere between Sharon Stone and Jean Triple Horn here, you know,

46:22

is she the Willowie innocent or is she the voracious feminine psycho?

46:29

And so it knows about the archetypes. It has a couple of amusing lines of dialogue or trashy

46:38

exploitation style moments. It has excellent production design and costume design. It is

46:46

expensive. And when we're talking about this particular genre and even the Colleen Hoover adaptations,

46:55

it is noticeably different in a positive way.

47:00

Yeah, you should, I think you should talk a little bit about what we can expect at this point

47:04

from Colleen Hoover stories though, because this movie isn't basic instinct or jagged edge, you know,

47:14

it's not an erotic thriller. It's not like an erotic legal thriller. This is a new kind of

47:21

brand of movie that has been born out of her fiction. How would you describe it? Like what are the

47:26

signals of it? Very taboo subjects kind of playing into a lot of what is popular in true crime.

47:40

Right now there is always an imperiled woman. There's always some sort of evil husband. The relationships

47:50

are complicated, sometimes abusive, sometimes violent. There are, there are often kids in danger.

48:00

There is, there's just, there's really, really kind of lurid

48:06

conflict throughout that is packaged in a way where it serves the lurid interest of the reader,

48:15

I think, but also is supposed to make them feel okay about being interested in it because they're

48:22

wrapped up in some sort of weird love story or romance most of the time. And so they, I guess

48:31

technically are romances, but they're always, I think the phrase in the industry is like,

48:37

quote, dark romance because it's always something really messed up. And there's a woman who is

48:46

either trying to find herself or find someone else in these extremely, extremely fucked up situations.

48:57

Yeah, so this is the fourth adaptation. And you know, four for four in terms of success right now,

49:04

we've had the end, it ends with us, which is the Blake Lively Justin Belldoni cultural fiasco

49:10

to have regretting you the funniest movie of 2025. We have.

49:15

Thousand percent. Reminders of him, which came out earlier this year, the Mike MnRod Tirek

49:20

Withers movie. And now we have this movie. This is a very stark cast, Michael Showalter,

49:26

you know, to me as a legend forever as a member of the state comedy troupe, one of my favorite

49:30

shows is a kid on MTV and has transitioned into what has historically been known as women's

49:37

pictures. You know, he directed Jessica Chastain to an Academy Award for her performance as

49:41

Tammy Faye Baker. And this movie is in a somewhat similar vein. It's not a docky drama, but it's

49:47

sort of a spin on that. His last movie was the idea of you, which also started in Halfway for

49:51

Amazon. Also a literary adaptation. Yes. And you know, he has a facility, I guess, with

50:00

these kinds of performers, you know, and they're not very many great male directors of female stars.

50:07

At this moment, so points for that, I suppose, I just feel like this movie is tilted in an angle

50:13

that like makes it relatively unsatisfying. And then also I think has like a truly awful ending.

50:20

Stinks. The movie is at war with its source material. And you really do feel like show up,

50:26

because the idea of you is also a romance. I think it's broadly in the same genre of,

50:33

it's very different audiences, I think, because these audience have, you know, their own

50:39

army is that it's a thing. They are, they're very powerful. And you see that in the box office.

50:44

But the idea of you is not that dissimilar in that it is adapted from a self-published

50:52

romance that had a rabbit online following starring in Halfway. That is about a woman in a creative

51:02

field who finds herself in an unusual relationship. And how is she gonna get through it?

51:10

The idea of you is that she's found herself in an unusual relationship with Harry Styles

51:15

and is navigating like the media. And the, in verity, it's that she's found herself in a relationship

51:23

with a man who has a wife in a coma. And is also, and the wife in the coma might also be haunting her.

51:31

And also she wants to have the wife in the coma's life because they're both writers. So I,

51:40

you can just feel that the film has disdain for the source material or at least, if not disdain feels

51:48

really constricted by it and doesn't know what to do with it. And so you mentioned there is kind of

51:55

a self-awareness and there are can't be funny moments where I do think the movie and the filmmakers

52:04

are making their version of what this, this setup would be. And it is ridiculous. And in Halfway is

52:11

basically like playing Joan Collins. And there are funny jump scares and, and, and that aren't scary

52:21

that are, that are laughing. And the reveals are sort of interesting. And then

52:26

they, they keep being pulled back to like what actually happens in the book. And you can tell that

52:34

the film isn't that interested in the source material. And also that the source material,

52:38

ultimately, does not really align with this. Can't be, aren't we all having fun here? Isn't this

52:45

ridiculous take on the story? And you said it's like having your cake and eating your eating it

52:53

too, which it sort of is, but honestly, it ultimately can't have it both ways. And that's why the

52:57

ending is so very, very frustrating and falls so flat. Because number one, it doesn't make sense.

53:02

But number two, it just any, any adaptive juice that the filmmakers bring to the material,

53:11

it kind of gets let's go at the very end. And due to its faithfulness, right? Like,

53:16

ultimately by sticking to the script of what's in the bottom of the story. Yeah. And I mean,

53:20

we can talk about some of the details of it. The movie, the three previous Colleen Hoover adaptations

53:27

are not, there's no wink in any of those three movies. They're very straightforward, sincere,

53:33

melodramatic explorations of, as you said, sort of women in very difficult relationships

53:38

for lack of a better phrase. And some of them are really, you know, about mortality and some of

53:44

them are about abuse and some of them are also just like, I wish I was fucking my husband's brother-in-law.

53:51

You know, like, there's always a lot of... But also, there was a car crash. But also, you know,

53:56

there was some sort of domestic abuse. Yeah. This movie is about a young writer who is cast

54:06

to effectively ghost-right another writer's work after they've been paralyzed. And

54:15

I would say roughly 32% of the movie is Dakota Johnson reading.

54:21

Which is one of the least cinematic things I've ever seen.

54:24

I would say, oh, so you mean just visually? Well, so it's Dakota Johnson reading, but it is

54:32

and half the way narrating. So correct. Right. So you're looking at and half way reading in a

54:38

beautiful house, which is a real house, by the way, in Armand, New York. But the, but the,

54:43

standing in for Vermont. Yes, but the bathroom and the like the stone tub, which is featured

54:51

prominently, were the creation of the production designer working with the original designers.

54:56

I see. Energy. So shout out to the production designer. Let me tell you, they get great use out of that

55:01

tub. They sure do. Right. And so every once in a while, they know what they're doing. And,

55:05

I mean, and the house, it is, it is house born. It's so beautiful. And the sweaters are just

55:11

just so, and Dakota Johnson's hair is so shiny. It's so shiny. But you're right that she does

55:17

spend a lot of time reading. There was one point where she gets in bed to read. And

55:24

she's, everyone else is asleep in the house and she's so cozy and she's got this book and she's

55:29

in this beautiful like primary suite. And I did think to myself as they showed this, I was like,

55:35

that's the life. Like that's all I want in life is to get into a cozy like bed like this. And

55:41

be able to read for hours and have no one bother me. I can't do it anymore. So, so even that,

55:47

even your note that it's just her reading for a while does understand something about its audience.

55:54

Right. It is aspirational to me. That that was not my problem. The problem when they're just

55:59

showing the manuscript, right? For a while and you're just seeing lots of insert shots of

56:05

the actual text. And it's, it is badly written and boring. That, that was less aspirational.

56:15

Yeah. I mean, I'll make a very brief comparison to a movie I've just recently seen that I wrote about

56:19

in the newsletter this week or last week, which is coronavirus, which is this small indie

56:24

that's about a young PhD professor of philosophy who has learned about the potential existence of

56:31

this thing called a coronavirus, which is a device that allows you to effectively see memories

56:37

of amazing historical events such as the crucifixion of Jesus Christ. And the movie is literally just

56:42

about this, this scholar reading in libraries and trying to learn more about this magical

56:50

mystical device that was developed by a Benedictine priest in the 1990s. And the movie is a,

56:57

you read the movie. The movie is constantly showing you text during the research of this project,

57:04

this exploration translated from Latin or Spanish or Italian or English and then highlighted on

57:09

screen. I've never seen a movie like it, the way that the music is used, the way that it's cut,

57:14

the reading, the, the act of reading is made into a thriller. This movie is easily a thriller

57:21

because there's life and death consequences and we don't know it's a, you know, a plot scheme

57:26

of some kind that we're trying to unpack while we're watching the movie. And I, I just found it's

57:31

terribly inert and I did not care where it was going. I mean, I guess I kind of sort of wanted to know

57:35

what the conclusion was going to be and I regretted wanting to know that when I got to it. But

57:40

the vibe is just off. You know, it just isn't really, it never really clicks into place what

57:45

the movie ultimately wants to be and maybe it, maybe you're right, it is just that this is kind of

57:49

junkie source material and she's, she's trying to write this sort of knowing piece of literary

57:56

inward self-locking analysis and it's just so schlocky and unfun. I mean,

58:04

we can get to the ending because in a minute because it does also reveal things about

58:11

the premise and the setup and the source material that I think are just

58:17

insurmountable, you know, it's kind of like one night only where it's like, well, if this is what

58:20

it was, then we were just, it was never going to work, you know, and you can, and you can try

58:24

your best and you can, you know, condition to go to Johnson's hair as much as you want and make

58:30

it look as cozy as possible and they did, but you can't solve this inherent problem. But I

58:35

agree with you that I do think I didn't mind the reading so much and I thought Anne Hathway's

58:40

narration was so over the top as to be funny, you know, she is doing her best

58:49

audible like on quailudes in press impersonation and it's quite funny.

58:56

The sex scenes were so poorly shot as to just be confusing. It's not even that they weren't hot,

59:08

which they weren't and that we are very far from erotic thriller territory. And, you know,

59:14

it honestly seems like they just, there was, there were some blocking issues like they didn't

59:18

have the shots that they needed. But it was so slow and the pacing of it all compared with the

59:25

couple of moments where they do actually manage to set up the suspense of whatever's going on

59:32

with the Verity character and there are some like creepy moments, creepy, they figured out sexy.

59:38

There's just, there's nothing. All there is is Josh Hartnitz short gym shorts. That's it.

59:43

You know, you clocked those huh? Oh yeah, immediately. I was an incredible choice.

59:49

Anne Hathway at a certain point in the film is a stride Josh Hartnitz. Yeah. And it's not really

59:54

that steamy. No. And then again, there's also the source material issue of their tide to

1:00:01

something about teeth in a wooden bedpost and being able to see the teeth marks. Yeah.

1:00:08

Which is just, have you done that? It's not logical. You know, it's not going to

1:00:13

work. The teeth are going to break, which is all Yasi and I could talk about in the theater. And

1:00:17

yes, we were whispering. So we were trying to be respectful. But first of all,

1:00:22

and it's not that's not what you would do. Second of all, there is some ergonomic angles. Third

1:00:28

issues, right? Third, your teeth would break. And fourth, how are you, how are your teeth going to

1:00:36

fit into the other woman's teeth marks so perfectly, right? That's a huge spoiler. Yeah.

1:00:41

So you're not a bider. That's what you're saying. Not of, not, you know, I would not a wood,

1:00:49

not a wood, not a wood, not a wood, not a wood. I was about to say that I didn't walk her into it.

1:00:54

Yeah. I think a lot, it's just very mannered. You know, like a lot of it. And if I don't know if

1:00:59

the wood biting is from the book, you know, I assumed it had to be because it was so specific.

1:01:04

I should check with Eileen. You know, my wife Eileen read the novel. She read it in 48 hours

1:01:09

effectively. And I raced to finish it before going to like a 2 p.m. screening on Thursday or

1:01:17

Friday. It was Thursday. And she, she did finish the book. And did not seem like she liked the

1:01:24

movie very much. And maybe even had some regrets. And we talked about this. We talked about this

1:01:28

coming out of Cinemacon and, you know, being handed the book on the way out. Yes. And then

1:01:34

my friend Mary saying, no, you will like it. Yeah. And you know, assuming it is as faithful as it

1:01:40

seems like, that's the biggest problem with it. And, you know, I think generally Anne Hathaway is

1:01:46

innocent. And she's kind of having fun in a different movie. And it feels a little bit like

1:01:51

it's the evil dark mirror version of Gone Girl. Where Gone Girl operates in a very similar fashion.

1:01:56

Where there's a lot of moments where we're reading Amy's diary. And then we're using that as a

1:02:01

portal to flash back on a relationship in a happier time. And the way that this movie kind of

1:02:08

pivots that is that we learn late in the film and really spoiling at this point that a lot of

1:02:16

what's been written in this discovered manifesto autobiography, Exposition Machine, is that it's a

1:02:24

writing exercise that the Anne Hathaway character has taken on to write the most kind of

1:02:30

negative untrue thoughts, the sort of the sort of evil reality that could be

1:02:39

to get into the mind state of the very devilish female characters that she writes in her books.

1:02:46

Which I don't, is that a thing? Is that a known strategy? I mean, only a writer this bad could come

1:02:53

up with a writing exercise, this nonsense. The call was the only way that I could justify it.

1:02:57

Also, the editor in question is named Amanda, who suggests the writing exercise. So I was just

1:03:03

like, why bring me into all of this stuff? But the key to the whole movie, which is this is just a

1:03:09

writing exercise, is about a 90 second flashback montage that is clearly filmed later. And

1:03:20

it's certain it makes no sense. It goes by so fast you don't get any of the motivation of you have

1:03:27

no explanation to what's going on with a variety character or how you're supposed to feel about her.

1:03:32

And Anne Hathaway is innocent, but also wasted in this movie because she doesn't really get to

1:03:38

do anything. They don't even use that much of the flashbacks or of the of the evil character that

1:03:45

turns out was just a writing exercise. I mean, it was just a writing exercise is worse than

1:03:51

it was just a dream or he's a psychopath in terms of explanations for thrillers.

1:03:58

I agree with you. And because of that, we're meant to sit through this movie where she does all of

1:04:01

these terrible things where like she considers, you know, smothering her infant child and she,

1:04:06

you know, regrets being a mother and plots to murder her family and has all of these awful ideas.

1:04:12

And you know, the movie is pitched at a register where you're like, this isn't exactly what happened.

1:04:16

I can tell like a lot of it, particularly like the death of the daughter, which underlines so much

1:04:22

of the movie as this kind of tragic moment that shifted everything is shot from so far at such a

1:04:28

distance that you're almost meant to feel like, well, something is off about this. We know the whole

1:04:34

time. Of course. But the explanation being that this was a writing exercise is so lame. It's so

1:04:40

unconvincing, you know. And I want to give the filmmakers credit of that they are signaling to you

1:04:46

that some things weird here, so you're going through okay. So was it the other kid? Was it Josh Hartman?

1:04:52

Did she actually do it? And it's, you know, what's going on with the nurse? Where did the nurse go?

1:04:58

Yassie asked me this when we got home. Where is this nurse in a terrible wig?

1:05:04

Who seems to be some sort of helper? She's just wandering around. She's always looking at

1:05:09

Dakota Johnson's character very suspiciously as if she's just put something in her food, you know.

1:05:16

And then she just disappears. I think she's almost literally only there to try to

1:05:25

represent a kind of Mrs. Danvers' ask character to remind us of Rebecca. Like I think that's the

1:05:30

only reason that she's there. And then there's no payoff on that or follow through on that. She

1:05:35

doesn't meaningfully participate in the other than leaving. Right. And she's not presence. Yeah.

1:05:41

She announces, hello, I'm leaving. And then you think that that's going to set in motion some sort of,

1:05:46

will she come back? Well, she like, and she just announced that she was leaving. There is absolutely

1:05:53

no follow through to the character. Yeah, I mean, it explains it creates the opportunity for Dakota

1:05:58

Johnson's character to be alone with Ann Hathaway's character in the house after the young boy

1:06:02

injured himself and Josh Hartner needs to take his young son to the

1:06:06

urgent care. And so then that leads to the sort of like, I thought a treacherous conclusion of

1:06:14

the movie that I'm still kind of sorting through what actually even transpired. So let's talk about

1:06:18

it briefly. Okay. Eventually, Josh Hartner does come back with his son and he's been made a way,

1:06:28

at that point, he's made aware of the truth about his wife that she is in fact responsible

1:06:36

for the death of their daughter, according to this autobiography that Dakota Johnson's character

1:06:40

has discovered and Dakota Johnson shares all this information with him. He has handed a printed

1:06:45

manuscript, which she printed out on a brother laser printer that we also have at home.

1:06:50

Shout out brother for the product placement. Great. And so she prints this out then seems to just leave

1:06:57

it in a trash can where no one finds it for at least a week and maybe three to four weeks.

1:07:04

And then she finally picks it up, reads to the end of it. She sets up a baby monitor in a

1:07:14

Verities room so that she can try to catch her in the act of not being there. And she

1:07:23

hands the manuscript over to Josh Hartner and says, look, this is what I found. This is what's

1:07:29

really going on. This is why I set up a baby monitor. Then they go in and he, he's finally in her face,

1:07:39

right? She because low in at first, low in that's the Dakota Johnson character.

1:07:44

The child is named crew C-R-E-W anyway, just just we've encountered this with with every

1:07:50

Hoover movie where all the names are like, ma'am, have a glass of water. Come on. What are we doing?

1:07:56

Lowen? I mean, lowen is at least lowen. I was a crew. How are we spelling crew? It's C-R-E-W.

1:08:04

I just feel like her trick every time is to be like, here's a normal person's name, Ashley

1:08:07

Lowen. What if I made the last name, the first name and the first name, the last name? Like,

1:08:11

all right. Right. Cool. You can keep doing this. Anyway, so lowen has tried to wake her from her

1:08:18

coma and she doesn't wake up, but she lowen and the Josh Hartner character, whose name I don't know

1:08:24

or care about because he's Josh Hartner. Walk back into the room and he gets into her face and

1:08:30

is yelling at her and threatening her. You're never going to see us again. Blah, blah, blah.

1:08:34

And then the moment when the very character breaks the coma and is like, you know,

1:08:39

there's an I started cheering and several people in my audience. That was the one moment where I was

1:08:44

like, this is funny. You skipped over one small detail, which is that the way that lowen tries to

1:08:50

wake her is by sticking a thumbtack into her thumb and making her bleed. And Anne Hathaway

1:08:55

doesn't flinch. She doesn't move. Nothing happens. She doesn't react at all to a thumbtack,

1:09:01

poking her body and bleeding. And then Josh Hartner yells loudly one time and she's like,

1:09:07

hey, whoa, my bad. It's me. I'm here. What else? It's me, Verity. Josh Hartner threatens her

1:09:12

access to her son, you know, and it's the power of a mother's love, right? We can withstand

1:09:16

thumbtacks, but not Josh Hartner threatening us. Yeah, except what happens later, which makes

1:09:27

this more logical. You weren't at all excited when she woke up. You don't get even get a chance

1:09:34

to be because within five seconds he's choking her to death. That's true. That's true. But then,

1:09:38

then you get even let Verity cook. Also, this was the only time we saw the real Verity and not

1:09:46

flashback writing exercise Verity. I still, what does she have to say? I chuckled. Like, I was like,

1:09:51

okay, this is funny because I, you know, I knew that she was faking it, but still they,

1:09:58

that was one of the heightened moments where I was like, okay, this is at least everyone's in on

1:10:02

the same joke right now in this moment. And this is funny. You're right. Then he starts

1:10:06

choking her because in a calling who her adaptation, you can't be more than two seconds away from

1:10:10

domestic abuse and violence. And so the Dakota Johnson character, Loan screams of him to stop,

1:10:19

and then there's a pause. And then what does she say, Sean? What does she say? She says,

1:10:24

you'll crush her Winpipe. And that which I really also left it. I thought that was, I mean,

1:10:31

it's not funny. Don't crush someone's Winpipe. It's none of this is funny, but the way that

1:10:35

Dakota Johnson plays it so solously and then gives the explanation as to how to kill Verity so that

1:10:45

the police will not be suspicious. I, I mean, I didn't laugh out loud, but I chuckled.

1:10:52

Can someone just like hand her a glass of seven up or something before doing a take? Like, wake up.

1:10:58

See, you can't say you'll crush her Winpipe in a blank monotone. That's the only time

1:11:05

where just the blankness makes any sense. And it was really, really, really funny to me. If you're

1:11:12

going to be that blank for the rest of the movie, then just say you're going to crush her Winpipe

1:11:19

like you're barely awake. It's I, I laughed. I thought it was absurd. He does, in fact,

1:11:28

not crush her Winpipe, but close her mouth and nose until Verity suffocates. And then they dump

1:11:33

her body in the lake. And then they've conspired to be together. That's what it turns out that these

1:11:40

two people, Mr. Crawford and, and, and, and, and Lohan Ashley are in love. They have murdered this

1:11:48

evil woman who killed his daughter. And they're ready to ride off into the sunset. We get a smash

1:11:55

cut to seven months later. And it appears that Lohan is pregnant. And they're still in the Vermont

1:12:02

home. The Verity death was ruled the suicide or was ruled in an accidental death. And they're

1:12:12

moving out. They got a house and was in North Carolina, South Carolina, where they going?

1:12:17

Somewhere down south. Yeah. I can't remember if it was North Carolina or Florida. And maybe I'm

1:12:22

just bringing in unfair Florida associations. Yeah. Crew, the young boy is excited. He's got a new mom.

1:12:28

Seems totally over the death of his sister and his mother seems to be handling it quite well.

1:12:33

Right. Um, he's getting ready to be a Southern boy. Happy for him. And he says, oh, hold on,

1:12:39

I gotta go get my drawings. He races back into his room. Mm-hmm. I love to recap, bad movies.

1:12:46

And he gets his drawings. And, and Lohan is like, what are those drawings? Where'd that come from?

1:12:51

And he's like, they're my secret drawings in my secret space. Which sure, that's something that

1:12:55

happens. And it appears that there's a floor board that has been loosed. Yeah. And Lohan clocks

1:13:03

this and this hiding place that this young boy has. She opens it up and what does she find, of course,

1:13:10

but an expositional letter. And I love when that happens in a film. And the letter is handwritten by

1:13:20

Variety to Josh Hartnitz character, Mr. Crawford. Mm-hmm. Explaining everything that he has done to him via letter.

1:13:30

Everything that he has done to her. To her. Yes. Yes. Okay. Everything he has done to her.

1:13:35

Um, and why did she do that, Amanda?

1:13:39

Yeah.

1:13:41

Also, it's not just explaining what he has done to her. But it is also explaining the mechanics of writing

1:13:52

and writing exercises. And how to get into the mind of a villain, right? That's right.

1:13:56

And postpartum depression and love for your children and how to stage a death via car and tree

1:14:08

and anger. Right. I, it's a great question. Is it addressed to him?

1:14:14

Does it say I believe so? I believe so. If you're reading this, then crew and I are gone. And

1:14:21

I think she says that she's ashamed, right? That's so that's why she did it. That's why she

1:14:30

agreed to be in a coma. I'm not defending the explanation. I'm just trying to recall the

1:14:35

contents of the exposition letter. And I think shame is part of it. So then she was just like I

1:14:41

wanted to stay in the coma to be near my son, crew, C-R-E-W. Mm-hmm.

1:14:49

It's very normal. It makes a lot of sense. And it teaches us a lot about writing and womanhood.

1:14:56

Right. But this also explains that Mr. Crawford has taken his, as, taken his wife out

1:15:05

into the forest and put her in a car and dropped a concrete block on the gas pedal,

1:15:11

driven her into a tree in an attempt to murder her. Which is a very, yes. Or made way to murder

1:15:18

someone. Well, but it is the method of death that is described at the end of the fake manuscript,

1:15:27

writing exercise. Right. Because he finds the manuscript as he learns in the letter. And

1:15:34

exactly. He reads it thinking it's real and not a writing exercise. Yes. And then he's so angry

1:15:45

because of what she's done. And she's confessing to killing her child in the fake manuscript.

1:15:52

So who would ever write that? Who would ever put that to words? What are we talking, Amanda?

1:15:59

What is happening here? What is happening here? I don't know. It's such

1:16:02

fucking nonsense. I agree with you. It doesn't, it doesn't make sense. It's clearly all cut

1:16:08

together. And it also is just, it's garbage source material. I mean, that the rot starts in the book.

1:16:13

That's what I have to say. Anyway, so that's why he, he decides to bring the manuscript to life

1:16:19

and actually kill her via tree the way that she kills herself in this book that he doesn't know

1:16:25

is just a writing exercise. And then it doesn't work or she doesn't, she's not fully killed.

1:16:31

She's just in a coma. And then. But then she's kind of not. And then the doctors don't realize that

1:16:38

this is a very wealthy person who's like, fake, like tricked everyone into believing she's in a,

1:16:44

a paralytic state and then can not respond. I don't, well, what's this nurse doing every day?

1:16:50

They do explain that she can eat, she can swallow, she can go to the bathroom.

1:16:57

But that she doesn't like make eye contact or talk. And there's no brain activity.

1:17:02

And it does sort of, they kind of yada yada with it. Like the brain is magical and unexplained,

1:17:06

you know? We, there's so much we don't know about science, you know? Which honestly,

1:17:10

you go to some doctors these days and it's still like, well, there's a lot we don't know.

1:17:14

Great. Thanks so much. So they do yada yada that, but I agree. She's faking

1:17:23

from with everyone. Is she self-medicating?

1:17:28

To like induce a coma state or she's just, I don't think so. I think she's

1:17:31

play acting for an extended period of time. Right. And we do also see that she's still

1:17:35

communicating with her son. Only one time she makes it clear to him that this is their secret.

1:17:41

We don't know that they're consistently talking to each other. That's not made clear to us.

1:17:45

But he does say earlier in the film, my mom me said that I shouldn't talk to you about these things.

1:17:53

And that is what inspires the Dakota Johnson character to go get the baby monitor.

1:18:00

Right. Right. It's it also just isn't yeah. It's the culmination of the hitch cocky and freak out

1:18:05

that is set up throughout the film. So this is good. This is good that this is how we're spending

1:18:13

our time on this podcast. I actually feel great about it because this to me much like Dicker.

1:18:17

It's like I cannot endorse this movie at all. And the success of these films I find quite worrying.

1:18:22

And I and I fucking felt this way with and ends with us. I was like, this is this is not right.

1:18:27

There's something very off about the way that these stories are being told. And

1:18:32

this one to me is like it's not problematic. It's just lousy. But you know the Dakota Johnson

1:18:38

character discovers this letter and reads this letter that Verity has written. And then that makes

1:18:45

her worried that she's now with a psychopath who has murdered his wife and pregnant with her

1:18:51

child. And then they move out of the house and hop in the car for a long drive down south.

1:18:58

And then the movie cuts to black. Yeah. I don't know. I was like, what?

1:19:06

So like are we waiting on Verity too to see if she seeks to avenge the slain Verity by killing

1:19:15

the father of her child? Like, I, is that are we meant to be like, wow, life's crazy. Sometimes

1:19:20

you accidentally marry a murderer. Like, what, what the fuck was that? I have no idea.

1:19:27

Okay. I mean, it's made worse. It's made worse, obviously, by the fact that there was a piece

1:19:31

in Variety over the weekend about the direction that the filmmakers thought about taking this story,

1:19:37

which was there was another ending that had been filmed that, well, why don't you just read the quote

1:19:45

that show Walter shared? Okay. In one version, Loan in that car scene has that moment where she says,

1:19:53

I don't know who to believe one thing's for sure. Verity was a master manipulator, which is

1:19:59

the last line of the film. Again, there's just like top to bottom. Great writing.

1:20:04

Well, the last line is her own hot ones. We forgot about talk about hot ones and

1:20:08

else Cooper as well as components of this movie. That's true. And then she puts on a pair of sunglasses,

1:20:15

leans back and has this very cat with a mouse in its mouth. Look, puts her hand out the window,

1:20:22

and is there driving away and a song is playing? She's making stage directions waves through the air

1:20:29

with her hands. So I'm doing that roller coaster. So the idea is that Loan is the master villain.

1:20:35

And then you cut back to Variety sinking into the lake and her eyes open.

1:20:43

Right. So I'm not I don't think that that's a more logical ending. No, but I do think it's a much

1:20:48

more fun ending. Correct. And if this movie wants to land on this is campy self-knowing trash,

1:20:58

I would have I would have smirked. I would have been like, all right, cool. That's fun. This

1:21:02

wasn't a great success to me, but that was pretty fun. And I'll I can forgive the plotting,

1:21:06

oddities and the writing exercise nonsense. And you're like, I'm the bad sex scenes. Yeah. Yeah.

1:21:13

The Bavarian restaurant. Yeah. Yeah. Man. I have no no notes on the on the tub scene.

1:21:21

No, no. The tub scene was very fun. She looks great in the dress that she borrows from Variety's

1:21:27

closet, which is an insane thing to do. Yes. There is an incredible single white female thing going

1:21:34

on in this that they just completely abandoned. And well, they they abandoned it or they don't they

1:21:43

were having fun with it for a bit. Yeah. I think it is homage generally. And then they stop.

1:21:49

They stop having fun with it. They're like, now we have to feel bad about this for some reason.

1:21:54

Now and and and I think the ending that show author described variety would at least be in keeping

1:22:00

with the this is all ridiculous. Yeah. And but they listened to the focus groups. They listened

1:22:05

to audience testing and audiences. Both audiences who had read the books and not read the books

1:22:09

reportedly did not respond to that ending. They responded to the ending that we got. Which what?

1:22:17

But did they because then the cinema score was a C. So like I you know, what are we

1:22:24

very odd. It's very odd. What I what I reading between the lines because calling Hoover is also

1:22:29

quoted in that variety piece. And she was a consultant on the film. She's involved in all of her

1:22:33

films. Yeah. And she is very happy with the ending, the ending mirrors the book. So I don't I guess it

1:22:41

was focus groups to me. It just reads like they got bullied into doing the book. And they had to stick

1:22:46

they had to stick to the original ending. Yeah, possibly. Possibly. I mean, I'm that's just an

1:22:50

interpretation. I don't know anything. But that they had that the source material is what is so

1:22:59

valuable about this IP. And it is what has the built an audience. And so they were just kind of

1:23:05

stuck with it. And it stinks because I think a more inventive ending would have at least

1:23:14

made us feel better going out of the movie. Yeah, I would have softened the blow for sure. I um

1:23:20

I found this to be quite poor. I thought this was really bad. And uh I and it's got a bunch of

1:23:25

people who I really like. Um I should buy a bunch of people. I mean two people in halfway in

1:23:29

Josh Hartnett. Uh Dakota Johnson. Let's speak on it once more. Okay. You know, she just hosted

1:23:35

SNL over the weekend. Um I think she's a radically better comic performer than she is dramatic actress.

1:23:42

She's had a couple of dramatic parts over the years that I've been okay with that I think they've

1:23:47

effectively utilized her emotional distance. You know her blankness very well. But this is getting

1:23:55

out of hand. This is this is becoming an issue. Um and I addressed this on the materialist pod.

1:24:02

Yeah. We spoke we spoke about Madam Webb. It's it's it's it's time for an intervention. She's

1:24:08

she's stunningly beautiful. She seems like a very smart and cool person. She seems she's quite a good

1:24:13

celebrity. But she is weighing down these feature films. This is an issue.

1:24:19

But put someone first of all who do you want to put in her spot? In this in the film.

1:24:25

Who are you going to cast that has the same mixture of um of aspirational beauty? Honestly she's so

1:24:33

she's so pretty. But also because she's willing to be blank is believable and is slightly younger

1:24:40

than in halfway is believable as the younger figure. I mean there are there are top line actors

1:24:49

that could go into the park. Well I think you knew that because I think Dakota Johnson is cast in

1:24:53

this because she's going to do the press tour and bring in a certain amount of of of audience

1:25:00

a J outside of the Colleen Hoover built an audience. I mean there's the there's the Emma Stone

1:25:05

Jennifer Lawrence Margot Robbie ring of mid 30s actresses who just like would be bet all three of

1:25:12

them would just make the movie better. Yeah. Maybe just make the movie better. And then there's

1:25:15

like another tier. And there's slightly more serious act self-serious actors. But I'll say like

1:25:22

if Daisy Edgar Jones or Alicia Vikander were in this movie. I think they would be better. I just

1:25:27

think they would be better. And for whatever reason Dakota Johnson's got a chokehold on this kind of

1:25:32

thing right now. And I'm sure you come up with a bunch of other. And into armist. If you put

1:25:37

an into armist in this part. Well, I think that's true though they did sort of with the Adrian

1:25:44

Line movie with Ben Affleck deep water. That's right. That I think we're the only people that ever

1:25:50

saw the end of it. And that didn't work out so well. Incredible Tracy Lutz performance. He's

1:25:55

wonderful. As always. The Elizabeth Olson Elizabeth Olson. I don't know because because here's

1:26:04

the here. No. Well, if you're putting Elizabeth Olson in this movie or Daisy Edgar Jones in this

1:26:14

movie, then you're making the serious Colleen Hoover version of this movie. And you're making

1:26:21

it sincere. I don't see you. You had great. Daisy Edgar Jones was in twisters. You know,

1:26:25

the Elizabeth Olson was the scarlet witch. Like it doesn't automatically have to be serious. I don't

1:26:32

think that neither of them are as funny. And Elizabeth Olson was in eternity. And I think that she was

1:26:38

the weakest part of eternity in my experience. She was. And so kind of can't carry the tone that the

1:26:46

film wants to be going for. The problem is that then at the end, they're still making a Colleen

1:26:51

Hoover movie. To me, the issue is that this story is really stupid. And we have to stop making these

1:26:56

books and we need better source material. And I think if Dakota Johnson, like the opening scene,

1:27:02

when she gets splattered with the blood and just doesn't react. And then they're in the bathroom

1:27:06

with Josh Harnett, that's the sexiest part of the movie. And yes. And that is campier and it's

1:27:14

ridiculous. And you know that he's going to be the husband and he's going to be in the meeting.

1:27:19

Like you understand. And the film knows that you understand it's playing in those like very

1:27:24

broad campy registers. And I think the blinkness works there because the blankness paired with the

1:27:32

comedy, like the wink wink of it all does fit in a way that those other people couldn't. And also,

1:27:37

I do think that there's something to see Dakota Johnson movie star though is she in one of these

1:27:44

adaptations. I don't think it's her fault. I do think it's the material's fault.

1:27:51

She was funny in splitsville. Enjoyed that. I just I think she's a comic actress. I feel like

1:27:56

everyone is so confused by her her obvious beauty. Yeah. But they believe that she should be cast

1:28:01

into things like this. And I thought she was almost never works. Very funny in the hot tub scene

1:28:08

in this film. She was she was she was many things. She was many things. But that is but I mean,

1:28:13

she's going for it. Yeah. Yeah. I don't know. This is a tough one. This is a tough one for the

1:28:19

for the Dakota heads. I don't know what the movie the movie Bafo business. 33 million four for four

1:28:26

for Hoover for different movie studios. She's shepherding this stuff very smartly. She seems to know

1:28:32

what she's doing. How many more more books does she have? I don't even know. She have like 10 books.

1:28:36

I think more. I think she just cranks them out. It's a volume business. Wow. Like CR. Damn.

1:28:43

Ah, okay. So we'll just be doing five more of these. Yeah. Or is this a moratorium on on

1:28:48

Hoover episodes? Well, if actors we like keep making them. I know. I know. That's the thing. We

1:28:56

really like you like two of the three. And I like all three. Yeah. And they, you know, they're

1:29:03

also doing the thing where it's like, Oh, Alison Williams is in this one. And Mike him and Ro. Oh,

1:29:07

my gals. Yeah. Keep casting all my gals. It's tough. It's tough for me.

1:29:12

Alison Williams ones was so good. Historical. Absolutely. Pure. It was like going to see

1:29:18

to hang over for the first time. Roll in the aisles. These are neurotic thrillers. This one is as close

1:29:26

as we've gotten to this. I guess when we talk when we talk about good trash, I'm trying to think

1:29:31

of what is our version of good trash right now that is in our popular culture. Well, I was thinking

1:29:35

a lot about the housemaid and the housemaid too, which I believe the book the housemaid

1:29:42

was written. I don't think in response to Colleen Hoover, but that these these books come of a

1:29:51

similar wave and that this project was I think Greenlit as a like, okay, well, we don't have

1:29:55

Colleen Hoover stuff, but we can buy these books that are also very successful that have a lot

1:29:59

of the same. I mean, you know, and that is like domestic abuse and people having sex in places

1:30:07

that they're not supposed to be having sex. So, you know, related. The housemaid is much more successful

1:30:13

and it is campier and and weirder. And I think the situation itself is also a lot more ridiculous

1:30:23

while also being upsetting, but it shows more and it also has has better set like it probably

1:30:30

is an erotic thriller. Yeah, I think so. Yeah. I think it is. And I that works for me a lot more

1:30:39

than whatever this is. I was more down on the housemaid than you were I think for similar plotting

1:30:44

reasons, but you know what? If I'm being honest, it would be hard for me to have I would have enjoyed

1:30:50

basically anything because that movie they just very hovened around the fuck out of that movie and

1:30:54

stone is unbelievable. But like if I it's if we had seen sliver in real time or body of evidence,

1:30:59

it would have been hard to be like what a great time like we would have been like the story is

1:31:03

really shitty and like doesn't really work and it would have been hard to appreciate its charms.

1:31:07

So I guess there's a case we made that in a few years you look at Verity and you're like oh,

1:31:11

if I watch it at home and it's a hundred minutes and it's sexy and it's got some funny stuff going

1:31:17

on and look at how and halfway as styled while appearing on hot ones. You know, I think I think

1:31:23

Joan Collins is apt. I was thinking of Daniel Steele a bit watching her too, you know, this sort of like

1:31:28

pearls and the you know, the lady suit, you know, the Nancy Reagan suit and the hair quoft and the

1:31:35

way that it is. Her office is like a sunken living room, tight circular and they they have it

1:31:41

styled in that very like 80s glitz sort of way. So I think the those references are intentional.

1:31:47

Yeah, it's a little odd that she looks that way in 2024 or whatever those interviews are

1:31:52

happening, but it's also kind of funny. How'd you feel about Alex Cooper's performance?

1:31:58

She did okay. She's fine. Yeah, she's fine. She was better than Sean Evans is the hot one

1:32:05

sky, but but also I think that the Sean Evans questions that he asks in the Verity hot ones are

1:32:12

the best writing within Verity because they are the truest to how he asks questions on hot ones.

1:32:17

It was a straight up Sean Evans question. Yeah. And he was like in your stories, what are the nine

1:32:23

is like nine modes of integrity or whatever it was that you were using?

1:32:28

And the delivery was spot on. We didn't get to see her eat any wings though. So that's disappointing.

1:32:34

When will they cast you in a film as a podcast host? Never. I wouldn't be so sure of that.

1:32:41

Many people out there listening thinking about how to get Amanda Dobbins in their movie.

1:32:46

Any closing thoughts here? You feeling good about? No. No. No. No. No. Your life at large.

1:32:54

I'm excited for I'm not excited for the social reckoning, but I'm excited for this weekend and

1:32:59

the other films that we get to talk about. You know, we've been building up October. It's like

1:33:04

October is when all the great stuff happens. And I think we're again, we haven't seen the social

1:33:08

reckoning yet. But we might be zero for three. It could be a very dark month. Yeah. That's kind of

1:33:18

where I have. I think they're all worth discussion. That's the things that is notable. It's like

1:33:23

they fit the bill for the mission of the show. Yeah. But there's no guarantee that we're getting

1:33:29

something great. You know, I was thinking about how when I was talking about Beetlejuice Beetlejuice,

1:33:34

that was like a September movie. And that was a really big movie. It wasn't like a great movie.

1:33:37

It wasn't great to talk about. But then you know, last September was one battle after another.

1:33:42

I remember. And then this past September, we got prime time. That was pretty cool. I really like that.

1:33:49

But it's been it's been it's very soft fall. Yeah. And then we were worried about.

1:33:54

And the festivals were soft. Yeah. And and you know, and then the the Paramount Warner Brothers

1:34:01

Sky Dance of it all, which is official very soon becomes just yeah, it's not it's not ideal.

1:34:08

Here's two things that are happening. You can see everything. Yeah. And will fall.

1:34:14

Those two things I can say with some confidence are worth paying attention to.

1:34:21

And we're going to see everything, including that was not an intentional pun. But we are. We will

1:34:27

be talking about the social reckoning. But I don't know. It's not I'm not like.

1:34:33

This is a little rocky. It's a little rockier than I hoped we would be at this point in the fall.

1:34:37

Yeah. It might be November season. Might not be October's year. Might be November's year.

1:34:43

Could it be in December's year? Egr season.

1:34:49

Could be. We'll see. Great. Okay. What are you going to go do for your rest of your day?

1:34:53

Oh, I'm I'm going to see a film. I don't know if I'm allowed to say that I'm going to see. I'm

1:34:57

seeing the same film you're seeing tonight. Oh, fun. Okay. Great. I'm going to say what I'm seeing.

1:35:01

I'm seeing artificial. Yeah. At the New York Film Festival. Big Gallup premiere at the

1:35:05

Alice Tully Hall. In fact, I have to get going very shortly to go do that. So I'm

1:35:10

Amanda. Thank you. Thanks to our producer, Jack Sanders for his work on today's episode. Thanks,

1:35:14

thanks to Remi here in New York for helping us out. Thanks to Lucas Kavanaugh for his production

1:35:18

support. As Amanda said later this week, we are finally seeing and discussing the legacy

1:35:24

wall of one of our favorite movies of all time. The social network. It's Aaron Storkins,

1:35:27

the social reckoning. He's the writer and the director of that movie. We'll watch it and then we'll

1:35:31

see you then.